EMI Source Identification via Profile Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Identifying the source of electromagnetic interference (EMI) in complex electrical systems, such as automotive vehicles, is challenging due to the numerous interconnected electrical components and cables, which form potential EMI sources, leading to delays in production as the existing methods fail to efficiently pinpoint the cause of unacceptable EMI.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the placement of antennas at fixed locations around the vehicle connected to receivers capable of wide-frequency range reception, measuring EMI, creating measurement profiles, simulating EMI using CAD data, and comparing profiles to identify matching sources, allowing for rapid diagnosis and reduction of EMI emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional EMI detection methods are used to identify EMI sources in complex electrical systems, then EMI detection capability is achieved, but identification time is excessive and production is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI source identification accuracyVSAvoidEMI source identification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex electrical system into multiple potential EMI sources, each consisting of a pair of electrical components connected by a cable. By dividing the system into discrete component pairs, the method enables systematic identification of EMI sources without requiring exhaustive testing of the entire system, thus improving identification accuracy while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary simulation of EMI characteristics for all potential EMI sources before actual measurement. By pre-calculating expected EMI patterns for each component pair using circuit theory and simulation tools, the system prepares reference data that accelerates the identification process during actual testing, eliminating the need for time-consuming trial-and-error debugging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of electrical components and cables is increased to meet vehicle functionality requirements, then system functionality is improved, but EMI complexity and difficulty of source identification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle system functionalityVSAvoidEMI source identification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by treating each cable-connected component pair as an independent potential EMI source. This modular approach allows the system to scale with increasing vehicle functionality while maintaining manageable identification complexity, as each new component pair can be added to the existing framework without fundamentally changing the identification methodology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simulated models (copies) of EMI characteristics for each potential source using circuit simulation. These virtual representations allow complex EMI patterns from numerous components to be analyzed without physically testing each configuration, reducing the complexity burden imposed by increased system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive EMI measurement across all frequencies is performed, then EMI detection completeness is improved, but measurement complexity and data processing burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI detection completenessVSAvoidmeasurement and data processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses simulation to create copies of expected EMI signatures for each potential source across the frequency spectrum. By comparing actual measurements against these pre-generated simulation profiles, the system achieves comprehensive frequency coverage without manually analyzing every frequency point, thus improving detection completeness while managing data processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where measurement results are compared against simulation predictions, and the comparison guides further investigation. This iterative feedback process allows comprehensive frequency analysis to be performed efficiently by focusing computational resources on frequency ranges and component pairs that show deviations from expected behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method simplifies the identification of EMI sources by creating measurement and simulation profiles, enabling effective diagnosis and reduction of EMI emissions, thereby reducing production delays and ensuring compliance with EMI limits.

Implementation Method 1

A plurality of antennas are positioned at spaced locations around or in the vehicle at known and fixed locations. Each antenna, furthermore, is connected to a receiver capable of reception over a wide frequency range.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation reception: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS8823389B2Method for identifying EMI sources in an electrical system
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 HITACHI LTD
  • US8823389B2 patent drawing
  • US8823389B2 patent drawing
  • US8823389B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for identifying EMI sources in a system having a plurality of electrical components connected together by cables wherein each set of two electrical components connected by a cable forms a potential EMI source. A plurality of antennas are positioned around the vehicle and the EMI from each antenna is measured over a plurality of frequencies and the frequencies having an EMI greater than a predetermined threshold and a measurement profile of the received EMI versus the antennas for each of the identified frequencies is created. EMI reception is then simulated for each potential EMI source and a simulation profile of the received EMI versus the antennas is plotted for each potential EMI source. The actual source of the EMI is then identified by comparing the measurement profile with the simulation profile for the potential EMI sources at each frequency to determine a match of the profiles.