Emissions Data Model with Extrapolation for Missing Values

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current database systems face challenges in efficiently collecting, managing, and analyzing emissions data, leading to delayed actions, inaccurate reports, and lack of transparency, which hinders timely climate action and effective auditing.

Innovation Solution

A data model for emissions analysis is implemented within a database system, enabling low-latency data modification, retrieval, and analysis, with extrapolation techniques to handle data gaps, normalization to prevent duplicate inputs, and user interfaces for transparent reporting and auditing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional data collection methods are used for emissions data, then data completeness may be achieved, but analysis time delays occur (taking several months)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions data completenessVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data validation, normalization, and aggregation during the data collection phase itself, rather than waiting until analysis time. Data is pre-processed and stored in a standardized format that enables immediate analysis when complete, eliminating the need for lengthy post-collection processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary data processing layer is introduced between data collection and analysis. This layer continuously validates, normalizes, and aggregates emissions data in real-time, maintaining a ready-to-analyze state without requiring intensive processing during the analysis phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual data collection processes are used, then data accuracy can be verified, but reporting delays occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions report accuracyVSAvoidreporting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops where data is continuously validated against predefined criteria, and anomalies are immediately flagged for review. This automated verification process maintains accuracy while operating at machine speed, eliminating manual checking bottlenecks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical data verification processes are replaced with automated computational validation systems. The system automatically checks data consistency, completeness, and accuracy using algorithms, achieving both high reliability and rapid processing that manual methods cannot match.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive emissions data is collected, then accurate reports can be generated, but data duplication and inefficiency occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions report accuracyVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different data processing and validation rules to different data sources and types based on their specific characteristics. Each data stream is normalized and validated according to its particular requirements, preventing unnecessary processing while ensuring appropriate accuracy for each source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts data collection and processing parameters based on the specific emissions source, data type, and reporting requirements. This adaptive approach collects comprehensive data where needed while avoiding duplication where not required, optimizing both accuracy and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If emissions data analysis is performed without transparency, then processing speed may be maintained, but auditing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing speedVSAvoidauditing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

An intermediary auditing layer is introduced that operates parallel to the data processing pipeline. This layer continuously logs, validates, and tracks all data transformations and calculations in real-time, providing transparent audit trails without interrupting or slowing down the main processing flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11327957B2Data model for emissions analysis
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 SALESFORCE INC
  • US11327957B2 patent drawing
  • US11327957B2 patent drawing
  • US11327957B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices supporting a data model for emissions analysis are described. Some database systems may store emissions data and support a sustainability application. The sustainability application may display reports that track and analyze data related to carbon emissions. In some cases, underlying data for a report is missing from the database system. The system may support extrapolation techniques to estimate the missing data and aggregate the underlying data—including the extrapolated values—according to a data schema of the database to calculate fields in a report. In some cases, a single data record may be used to generate multiple reports. The system may send one or more results to a user device for display in a user interface (e.g., in one or more dashboards). Additionally or alternatively, the system can display underlying calculations (e.g., report calculations, extrapolation calculations, etc.) in the user interface to support auditing activities.