Drip Irrigation Emitter Pressure-Responsive Valve Flow Regulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drip irrigation emitters fail to effectively regulate liquid flow based on varying pressures in irrigation pipes, leading to inefficient water distribution and potential clogging from foreign matter accumulation.

Innovation Solution

A drip irrigation emitter design featuring a flow path with pressure reducing parts, a venting zone, and a regulating zone, along with a duct that allows fluid communication above a threshold pressure, enabling regulated and non-regulated flow adjustments based on pressure changes, and a seal mechanism that prevents fluid ingress below the threshold pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a conventional drip emitter with fixed flow-restricting path is used, then the emitter structure is simple, but the flow regulation capability under varying pipe pressures is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow regulation capabilityVSAvoidemitter structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The emitter incorporates a movable valve that can shift position along the flow-restricting path in response to pressure changes. The valve is actuated by a pressure-sensitive element that responds to inlet pressure variations, dynamically adjusting the flow path length to maintain stable discharge flow despite changing pipe pressures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The emitter changes the physical parameter of flow path length by moving the valve position. When inlet pressure increases, the valve moves to extend the flow path, increasing flow resistance and reducing discharge flow. When inlet pressure decreases, the valve moves to shorten the flow path, decreasing flow resistance and maintaining discharge flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the flow-restricting path is made longer to reduce flow, then the discharge flow is lower, but the emitter becomes more prone to clogging from foreign matter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater distribution efficiencyVSAvoidclogging resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The emitter employs periodic pulsing action where the valve rapidly opens and closes in response to pressure fluctuations and foreign matter encounters. This periodic valve operation creates pulsing flow that prevents foreign matter from accumulating in the flow-restricting path, maintaining clear flow channels while achieving effective flow regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The emitter maintains continuous useful action through the pulsing valve mechanism that continuously adjusts flow path length in response to pressure changes and foreign matter presence. This continuous dynamic adjustment ensures the flow-restricting path remains clear and functional, preventing clogging while maintaining efficient water distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If the emitter is designed to regulate flow precisely, then the flow control is improved, but the response time to pressure changes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control precisionVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The emitter replaces complex mechanical flow control mechanisms with a simpler pressure-sensitive valve system. The valve is directly actuated by inlet pressure changes through a pressure-sensitive element, eliminating the need for external control mechanisms and achieving rapid response to pressure variations while maintaining precise flow regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The emitter ensures efficient water distribution by regulating flow rates independently of inlet pressure within a designed range and effectively clears foreign matter by pulsing liquid above the threshold pressure, maintaining optimal operation and preventing clogging.

Implementation Method 1

a seal of the emitter may prevent fluid communication via the duct below the threshold pressure and allow fluid communication via the duct above the threshold pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure threshold response:

Implementation Method 2

pressure reducing flow parts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure reduction: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 3

a duct that is adapted to provide fluid communicating between the venting zone and the outside environment above a threshold pressure of liquid in the pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure-driven flow: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS8998113B2Drip irrigation emitter
Publication Date: 2015.04.07 NETAFIM LTD
  • US8998113B2 patent drawing
  • US8998113B2 patent drawing
  • US8998113B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drip irrigation emitter receives liquid flowing in an irrigation pipe at an inlet pressure and emits the liquid out of the emitter at an outlet pressure lower than the inlet pressure. The emitter has a flow path through which the liquid flows in the emitter, wherein below a threshold pressure of liquid in the pipe the emitter is adapted to emit a regulated flow of liquid out of the emitter, and above the threshold pressure of liquid in the pipe the emitter is adapted to emit a non-regulated flow of liquid out of the emitter.