EMR Adoption Analysis System with Targeted Intervention Modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current healthcare systems face inefficiencies due to inadequate adoption and proper use of electronic medical record (EMR) systems, leading to reduced accuracy, increased user errors, and resource misallocation, as users often fail to adopt EMR systems effectively, resulting in suboptimal system performance and resource wastage.

Innovation Solution

An objective EMR system adoption analysis system that assesses user knowledge, attitude, and practice through subjective and objective inputs, calculates scores, and provides intervention modules to address knowledge, attitude, or practice gaps, ensuring proper adoption and usage of EMR systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If users are provided with EMR system training and updates, then system knowledge is improved, but user engagement and adoption remain insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMR system adoptionVSAvoiduser efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors user interactions with the EMR system and provides feedback through the dashboard, identifying adoption barriers and triggering targeted interventions to improve both reliability and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically assesses user adoption status and generates personalized intervention recommendations without requiring manual evaluation, enabling self-service monitoring and improvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual assessment of EMR adoption is used, then system complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and objectivity are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadoption assessment accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual assessment methods with an automated computer-based system that objectively measures adoption through digital tracking of user interactions, improving measurement precision while managing complexity through structured data collection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a dashboard and automated assessment module as intermediaries between raw user data and adoption determination, processing information objectively and consistently to improve measurement accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If intervention modules are provided to address adoption gaps, then EMR system performance is improved, but resource allocation becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMR system performanceVSAvoidintervention management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides targeted interventions tailored to specific user groups and specific adoption barriers identified through data analysis, improving performance efficiently rather than applying uniform solutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively identifies adoption barriers and triggers interventions before they impact system performance, preventing issues rather than reacting to them and simplifying management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12100317B2System and method to objectively assess adoption to electronic medical record systems
Publication Date: 2024.09.24 CERNER INNOVATION INC
  • US12100317B2 patent drawing
  • US12100317B2 patent drawing
  • US12100317B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are disclosed herein for providing objective electronic medical record (EMR) system adoption analysis. In one embodiment subjective and objective inputs are received by a user via a user computing device. The subjective input includes at least one of knowledge of an EMR system, attitude towards the EMR system, or practice with the EMR system. The objective input includes demographic data related to the user of the EMR system. A score is then calculated for the objective and subjective input. Calculating the score includes weighting the objective and the subjective input to determine one or more of a knowledge score, an attitude score, or a practice score. It is determined that at least the attitude score is below a predetermined threshold. In response, an intervention module associated with attitude score is automatically transmitted to the user.