Emulation Apparatus for Closed-Loop DBS Algorithm Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems deliver constant stimulation, lacking adaptability and real-time adjustment based on brain response, which limits their efficacy and increases side effects, and the difficulty in testing control algorithms in real patients hinders advancements in closed-loop stimulation protocols.

Innovation Solution

An emulation apparatus that models the temporal evolution of electrophysiological signals under stimulation, allowing for the simulation of DBS effects, enabling the testing of complex control algorithms and parameter adjustments in a controlled environment before clinical use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If closed-loop DBS control is implemented to automatically adjust stimulation parameters based on brain response, then treatment efficacy is improved and side effects are reduced, but the complexity of the system increases and regulatory approval becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the human nervous system through the NEUROSCAPE emulation apparatus. This digital twin includes realistic neuronal models, network architectures, and physiological responses that replicate actual brain behavior under DBS stimulation. Researchers can test control algorithms on this virtual copy before clinical deployment, reducing regulatory barriers while maintaining treatment efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The emulation apparatus enables preliminary testing and validation of closed-loop control algorithms in a virtual environment before actual clinical implementation. This preliminary action allows comprehensive evaluation of algorithm performance, safety, and efficacy without risking patient safety, thereby simplifying the regulatory approval process for complex DBS systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If control algorithms are tested in real patients to improve closed-loop stimulation protocols, then algorithm performance is validated, but patient safety risks increase and the difficulty of testing remains high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm validation accuracyVSAvoidpatient safety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of testing directly on real patients, the patent uses a virtual copy (digital twin) of the nervous system that replicates physiological responses. This allows accurate validation of control algorithms through realistic simulation of brain responses to stimulation, eliminating patient safety risks while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The emulation apparatus serves as a protective buffer before clinical testing. By thoroughly validating algorithms in the virtual environment first, potential safety issues are identified and resolved beforehand, cushioning against harmful effects that might occur during actual patient testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Ease of operation

If constant amplitude stimulation is delivered at fixed high frequency, then the treatment is simple to implement, but adaptability to individual patient responses is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidpatient response adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic stimulation parameters that adapt in real-time based on measured brain activity. The system continuously monitors local field potentials and adjusts stimulation amplitude, frequency, or pulse width according to detected neural oscillations and patient response, transforming fixed constant stimulation into an adaptive dynamic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The closed-loop system incorporates feedback mechanisms where brain activity measurements (local field potentials) are continuously fed back to the stimulation controller. This feedback enables automatic adjustment of stimulation parameters to optimize therapeutic effect while minimizing side effects, providing adaptability while maintaining ease of operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12005260B2Emulation of electrophysiological signals derived by stimulation of a body
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 OXFORD UNIVERSITY INNOVATION LTD
  • US12005260B2 patent drawing
  • US12005260B2 patent drawing
  • US12005260B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An emulation apparatus emulates an electrophysiological signal derived from a target area of a human or animal nervous system under the influence of a stimulation signal applied to the human or animal body. A prior signal generator generates a prior signal representing an electrophysiological signal in the absence of stimulation. A test signal representing a stimulation signal is received and used by a modelling unit to derive a modulation signal representing the degree of modulation of the electrophysiological signal, in accordance with a model of the temporal evolution of the modulation of the electrophysiological signal caused by the stimulation signal. A modulation unit modulates the prior signal in accordance with the modulation signal to output an emulation signal representing an electrophysiological signal derived under the influence of the stimulation signal. The emulation apparatus has wide use in neuroscience research, bioengineering and clinical applications.