Enantiomeric Separation via Preferential Crystallization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for resolving optical enantiomers of dihydro-1,3,5-triazine derivatives are energy-intensive and generate waste, requiring expensive chiral resolving agents and often result in incomplete enantiomeric purity.

Innovation Solution

The process involves preferential crystallization of racemic mixtures that form stable conglomerate salts, allowing for the isolation of optical enantiomers without a chiral resolving agent, using seeding and repetitive crystallization in suitable solvents like ethanol, achieving high enantiomeric excess and yield.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If chiral resolving agents are used for enantiomeric separation, then enantiomeric purity is improved, but process cost and waste generation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenantiomeric purityVSAvoidwaste generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and utilizes the natural conglomerate-forming property of the dihydro-1,3,5-triazine salts themselves, removing the need for external chiral resolving agents. The racemic mixture is directly crystallized as a conglomerate and separated by preferential crystallization, eliminating the substance (resolving agent) that causes waste and cost issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The dihydro-1,3,5-triazine salts perform their own separation function by forming conglomerates that can be separated by preferential crystallization. The substance itself provides the mechanism for enantiomeric separation without requiring external chiral agents, making the process self-sufficient and waste-free.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional enantiomeric separation methods are used, then enantiomeric purity is achieved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenantiomeric purityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention utilizes the phase transition of preferential crystallization from the racemic mixture to separate enantiomers. By controlling crystallization conditions, one enantiomer preferentially crystallizes while the other remains in solution, achieving separation through this phase change rather than energy-intensive methods like distillation or repeated chromatography.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

3Manufacturing precision

If chiral resolving agents are employed, then enantiomeric resolution is improved, but process complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenantiomeric resolutionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the complex component (chiral resolving agent) from the separation system, simplifying the process to direct preferential crystallization of the racemic mixture as a conglomerate. This extraction of the resolving agent eliminates the need for complex addition, removal, and recovery steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Manufacturing precision

If diastereomeric resolution is used, then enantiomeric separation is achieved, but yield is reduced due to incomplete recovery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenantiomeric separationVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements continuous recycling of the mother liquor containing the other enantiomer back into the preferential crystallization process. This continuous action ensures that both enantiomers are eventually recovered with high yield, eliminating the waste associated with discarding mother liquors in conventional diastereomeric resolution methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables efficient, energy-saving resolution of optical enantiomers with theoretical quantitative yield and reduced waste, using preferential crystallization to isolate enantiomers from racemic mixtures that crystallize as conglomerates, improving safety and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

it has been found that compounds of formula I can form stable conglomerate salts and that the optical enantiomers of these salts can be resolved by preferential crystallization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystallization: Crystallisation

Implementation Method 2

the optical enantiomers of these salts can be resolved by preferential crystallization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPreferential crystallization: Crystallisation

Data Source

PatentUS8742102B2Process for enantiomeric separation of racemic dihydro-1,3,5 triazines via preferential crystallization
Publication Date: 2014.06.03 POXEL
  • US8742102B2 patent drawing
  • US8742102B2 patent drawing
  • US8742102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A new process for the enantiomeric separation of racemic 3,6-dihydro-1,3,5-triazine derivatives for the treatment of disorders associated with insulin-resistance syndrome, by preferential crystallization.