Encapsulated Antimicrobial Coating for Contamination-Resistant Filters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional filtration technologies face issues with microbial colonization and contamination in filters, leading to degraded performance and health risks, while existing antimicrobial solutions like photocatalysis, silver nanoparticles, and irradiation treatments have drawbacks such as high costs, safety concerns, and instability.

Innovation Solution

An antimicrobial coating material is developed using encapsulated biocides within inorganic-organic shells, which are permeable to biocides, allowing for both contact-killing and time-released antimicrobial properties, suitable for porous materials and media.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional filtration technology is used, then air and water purification is achieved, but microbial colonization and contamination occur in the filters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration performanceVSAvoidmicrobial colonization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-coating the filter material with antimicrobial agents before the filter is put into service. The coating includes biocides embedded in a polymer matrix that provides immediate and sustained antimicrobial protection, preventing microbial colonization before it can occur. This proactive approach ensures the filter maintains its antimicrobial properties throughout its service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuity of useful action through a sustained-release antimicrobial coating system. The biocides are released continuously over an extended period (e.g., 6 months to 2 years), maintaining constant antimicrobial activity in the filter. This ensures uninterrupted protection against microbial colonization while the filter operates, eliminating the need for frequent reapplication or replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Object-generated harmful factors

If photocatalytic disinfection is added, then microbial killing is enhanced, but device complexity and cost increase due to additional light sources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrobial killingVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for external light sources, power supplies, and control systems by using a chemical-based sustained-release antimicrobial coating. The biocides in the coating provide passive, autonomous antimicrobial protection through diffusion and contact killing, removing the complexity of active photocatalytic systems while maintaining effective microbial control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a cost-effective polymer-based coating formulation using readily available biocides and common polymers. The coating is applied as a simple surface treatment that provides long-lasting protection without requiring expensive equipment, materials, or maintenance infrastructure associated with photocatalytic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If silver nanoparticles are used, then antimicrobial activity is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantimicrobial activityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes expensive silver nanoparticles with cost-effective alternative biocides such as organic compounds, phenolics, quaternary ammonium salts, or natural extracts. These biocides are incorporated into a polymer matrix that enables sustained release, providing comparable or superior antimicrobial activity at a fraction of the material cost, making the coating economically viable for large-scale filter production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite coating material combining biocides with a polymer matrix. This composite structure allows the biocides to be released gradually over time, extending their effectiveness and reducing the need for high initial concentrations. The polymer carrier also improves stability and controls release kinetics, enhancing overall cost-efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Object-generated harmful factors

If irradiation treatments are applied, then rapid disinfection is achieved, but device cost and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisinfection speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by designing a coating system that automatically provides antimicrobial protection without external energy input. The biocides are released passively through diffusion, concentration gradients, or contact with microbes, performing disinfection autonomously. This eliminates the need for electricity, UV lamps, or other energy-consuming devices while maintaining continuous protective action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses inexpensive chemical biocides that provide rapid disinfection through direct contact and chemical action. These biocides work immediately upon release from the polymer matrix, achieving fast microbial killing without the high energy costs of irradiation systems. The coating is applied once and provides long-term protection, reducing operational expenses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The coating effectively inhibits microbial growth and contamination in filters, maintaining performance and safety over extended periods without increasing costs or stability issues.

Implementation Method 1

The biocides are encapsulated in inorganic-organic shells which are permeable to the biocides

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPermeation: Permeation

Implementation Method 2

The inorganic materials may be, as non-limiting examples, titania sol, titanium peroxo complex sol, silica sol, alumina sol or combinations thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSol: Sol

Data Source

PatentUS12582118B2Antimicrobial coating material for surface coating
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 THE HONG KONG UNIV OF SCI & TECH
  • US12582118B2 patent drawing
  • US12582118B2 patent drawing
  • US12582118B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The antimicrobial coating material for surface coating is formed from encapsulated biocides. The biocides include at least one antimicrobial component. The biocides are encapsulated in inorganic-organic shells which are permeable to the biocides. The organic materials may include at least one nonionic polymer. The inorganic-organic shells encapsulate and contain the biocides to form capsule structures for storage and release of the biocides. The capsule structures may be single capsules or capsule-in-capsule structures. The inorganic materials may be present in a concentration of 0.5-95 wt % of the inorganic-organic shells. Alternatively, the inorganic materials may be present in a concentration of 5-60 wt %. The inorganic materials and the organic materials are each intermixed, with respect to one another, in structures of the inorganic-organic shells. These structures may be an attachment structure, a hybrid structure or a multi-layered structure.