Enclave Pool Shared Key for Off-Chain Smart Contract Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current blockchain systems face challenges in securely executing smart contracts off-chain while ensuring the integrity and authenticity of transactions, particularly in providing secure execution environments and managing enclave resources efficiently.

Innovation Solution

The formation of an enclave pool with secure execution environments, where enclaves are allocated to cryptlets based on demand, and a shared enclave pool key is generated for digital signature validation, allowing cryptlets to execute securely and efficiently, with outputs attested using multiple digital signatures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If enclaves are allocated to cryptlets from an enclave pool, then resource efficiency and scalability are improved, but security management complexity increases due to multiple enclaves requiring validation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidsecurity management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple enclave signatures are merged into a single threshold signature verification process. The system combines the cryptographic verification of multiple enclaves into one unified validation mechanism using the shared pool public key, reducing the operational complexity of managing multiple individual signature verifications while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The shared enclave pool public key serves multiple functions: it authenticates individual enclaves, validates threshold signatures, and enables scalable enrollment of new enclaves. This universal verification mechanism allows the system to efficiently manage security across multiple enclaves without requiring separate validation processes for each enclave.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple digital signatures are used for payload validation, then transaction integrity and security are improved, but verification time and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction integrityVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring verification of all enclave signatures for every transaction, the system implements threshold signature verification where only a predetermined number of signatures (k out of n) are required. This partial action approach maintains security through multiple signatures while reducing verification time by not requiring complete signature sets for every validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a shared pool public key that represents multiple enclave identities. Rather than distributing and verifying multiple individual public keys, the verifier uses a single copied/derived pool public key to validate signatures from multiple enclaves, significantly reducing verification time while maintaining the security benefits of multiple signatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If an enclave pool is formed with multiple enclaves, then system scalability and flexibility are improved, but key management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem scalabilityVSAvoidkey management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shared enclave pool public key acts as an intermediary that simplifies key management. Instead of managing individual key pairs for each enclave, the system uses a single pool public key that represents the entire enclave pool. This intermediary key enables scalable enrollment of new enclaves while maintaining simplified verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The key management system is segmented into two distinct layers: individual enclave key pairs for signing operations, and a shared pool public key for verification operations. This segmentation allows enclaves to be independently managed and enrolled while the verification layer remains simplified and scalable through the unified pool key.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11176246B2Enclave pool shared key
Publication Date: 2021.11.16 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11176246B2 patent drawing
  • US11176246B2 patent drawing
  • US11176246B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one example, an enclave pool is formed. The enclave pool may include a plurality of enclaves. Each enclave may have a private enclave key and a public enclave key. A shared enclave pool key may be generated from or otherwise based on the public enclave key of each enclave of the enclave pool. A first enclave may be allocated from the enclave pool to a first cryptlet. A payload of the first enclave is received. The payload of the first enclave may be signed with a first digital signature by the private enclave key of the first enclave. A payload of the second enclave may be received. The payload of the second enclave may be signed with a second digital signature by the private enclave key of the second enclave. The first digital signature and the second signature may be validated via the shared enclave pool key.