Encoded Email Event Scheduling Across Organizations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Scheduling meetings across multiple organizations is challenging due to inaccessible availability information and cumbersome user interfaces, especially as the number of potential attendees grows.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows a sender device to generate an email with encoded data elements specifying proposed meeting times, which can be embedded in the email message and transmitted to recipient devices, enabling users to select available times and automatically create event entries in their electronic calendars, facilitating coordination across different organizations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional email or calendar systems are used to schedule meetings across different organizations, then availability information can be accessed, but the user interface becomes cumbersome and confusing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability information accessibilityVSAvoiduser interface simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex scheduling process into distinct components: sending proposed times via email, receiving availability responses separately, and automatically determining optimal times. This segmentation simplifies the user interface by eliminating the need for a complex integrated scheduling system while maintaining availability information exchange.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated system that acts as a mediator between users. The system receives availability information from recipients, processes it against proposed times, and automatically determines optimal meeting times, thereby simplifying the user interface while maintaining comprehensive availability checking across organizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of potential meeting attendees increases, then more perspectives are available, but the difficulty in scheduling a convenient time magnifies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeeting coordination capabilityVSAvoidscheduling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service automation where the system automatically processes availability information from multiple recipients, compares it against proposed times, and determines optimal meeting times without requiring manual coordination. This eliminates the exponential increase in scheduling complexity that normally accompanies more attendees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by automatically collecting availability information from all recipients and pre-processing it against proposed times before presenting options to the sender. This preliminary automation handles the complex coordination of multiple attendees, reducing the time required as the group size increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If manual coordination methods are used to schedule meetings, then flexibility is maintained, but the scheduling process becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling flexibilityVSAvoidscheduling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary automated actions by collecting availability information and processing proposed times before the user needs to make a decision. This preliminary automation maintains flexibility in selecting from multiple proposed times while dramatically improving scheduling efficiency through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where recipients provide availability information in response to proposed times, and the system automatically processes this feedback to determine optimal meeting times. This automated feedback loop maintains scheduling flexibility while improving efficiency by eliminating manual iteration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10298530B2Scheduling events
Publication Date: 2019.05.21 OMNISSA LLC
  • US10298530B2 patent drawing
  • US10298530B2 patent drawing
  • US10298530B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are examples relating to scheduling events using devices in communication through a network. In some examples, an email message comprising an encoded data element is obtained. The encoded data element includes data that specifies a proposed time for an event. The data that specifies the proposed time for the event is extracted from the encoded data element. Content from the email message is rendered in a user interface. A user interface element is rendered within the user interface. The user interface element represents the proposed time for the event and an availability for the event at the proposed time.