Encoder-Decoder Learning Path Sequencing for Personalized Mastery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing learning path recommendation methods struggle to ensure personalization and effectiveness due to reliance on paths used by other users, limiting the customization and learning impact for individual users.

Innovation Solution

A data processing method that determines a learning order of knowledge points based on current user states and feature representations, using an encoder and decoder to identify relationships and optimize the sequence generation, incorporating attention mechanisms and LSTM networks to enhance personalization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If collaborative filtering or content-based filtering is used to recommend learning paths based on other users' historical data, then the recommendation speed is improved, but the personalization degree and learning effect deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation speedVSAvoidpersonalization degree
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the learning path recommendation into two parts: using historical user data for fast initial recommendation and using real-time student state (mastery level, attention) for dynamic personalization adjustments. This allows the system to maintain speed while improving personalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic elements by continuously tracking student state (mastery level, attention level) and adjusting the learning path in real-time based on current performance, rather than relying solely on static historical data from other users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If complete learning paths are recommended at the beginning based on user clustering, then the recommendation efficiency is improved, but the adaptability to individual learning states deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to learning states
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static complete learning path into a dynamic sequence that adapts as the student progresses. The system continuously updates the recommended next knowledge point based on real-time mastery level and attention level, allowing the path to flexibly adjust while maintaining overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary clustering and path generation based on historical data to establish an initial efficient learning path, then uses real-time state monitoring to make targeted adjustments, combining the benefits of both pre-computation and real-time adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If paths are selected from historical user data, then the system complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision of individual learning needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidmeasurement precision of learning needs
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer (the reinforcement learning agent) that translates simple historical path data into precise individualized recommendations by incorporating real-time student state measurements, thereby improving measurement precision without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous feedback loops where student performance on knowledge points feeds back into the recommendation system, allowing the system to progressively refine its understanding of individual learning needs based on actual performance data rather than relying solely on complex pre-analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250299586A1Data Processing Method and Related Device
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US20250299586A1 patent drawing
  • US20250299586A1 patent drawing
  • US20250299586A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data processing method includes obtaining feature representations of a plurality of knowledge points and a first learning state of a user, the first learning state indicates a user's level of mastery of a learned knowledge point, and the plurality of knowledge points are different from the learned knowledge point; and obtaining, by using a decoder based on the feature representations of the plurality of knowledge points, the first learning state, and a learning objective, a learning order corresponding to the plurality of knowledge points, the decoder is configured to identify a relationship between the feature representations of the plurality of knowledge points and the learning objective in the first learning state. The learning order of the plurality of knowledge points is determined in a sequence generation manner based on a current learning state of the user.