Encrypted Delta Reversion for Anti-Learning Content Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The unauthorized use of data for training neural networks poses a significant challenge in the context of AI-generated art, as artists lack effective methods to protect their intellectual property from unauthorized exploitation.

Innovation Solution

Intentional data poisoning is employed to create a poisoned data set, which can be reverted to the original using a cryptographically encoded license-key, ensuring only authorized use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If data is left unprotected for machine learning training, then accessibility and usability of data is improved, but intellectual property rights and authenticity of creative works are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accessibilityVSAvoidintellectual property protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by embedding authentication metadata and digital watermarks into data files before they are distributed or used for training. This preemptive measure ensures that provenance information is already present in the data, enabling later verification of authorization without requiring complex real-time authentication systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary authentication mechanism that acts as a mediator between data providers and machine learning systems. This intermediary layer verifies authorization through embedded metadata and watermarks, allowing data to remain accessible while ensuring proper rights management without direct complex interactions between parties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If data is protected with authentication mechanisms, then intellectual property rights are safeguarded, but data processing complexity and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the authentication verification logic into separate, modular components such as standalone watermarks and metadata structures. This extraction allows the core machine learning processing to remain simple while authentication functions are handled by dedicated, lightweight verification modules that check embedded markers without complicating the main data processing pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by using subtle, embedded modifications like digital watermarks and metadata fields rather than overt protection mechanisms. These parameter changes are imperceptible to standard data processing operations but provide robust authentication signals, maintaining system simplicity while enhancing security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If perturbation is introduced to prevent unauthorized training, then data protection is improved, but data quality and utility for authorized uses may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-learning protectionVSAvoiddata integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing perturbation only in specific, localized regions of the data or in targeted features rather than uniformly across the entire dataset. This selective perturbation maintains high data quality in critical areas while providing sufficient anti-learning protection in vulnerable regions, preserving both data integrity and protection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite data structures that combine original data with embedded authentication markers and perturbation patterns. This composite approach integrates multiple functions—protection, authentication, and data utility—into a unified structure where each component serves its purpose without significantly degrading the overall data quality or authorized use cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20260003940A1Anti-learning for digital content protection and rights management
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 SCHNEIDER DANIEL
  • US20260003940A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003940A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003940A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment receives a first original dataset. The embodiment modifies the first original dataset to create a first poisoned dataset. The embodiment obtains a delta between the first original dataset and the first poisoned dataset. The embodiment encrypts the delta to create an encrypted delta and a corresponding encryption key. The embodiment decrypts, using the encryption key, the encrypted delta to create a decrypted delta. The embodiment reverts, using the decrypted delta, the first poisoned dataset into the first original dataset.