Zero-Knowledge Voiceprint Sharing via Encrypted Comparison Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional voiceprint sharing technologies fail to provide secure, zero-knowledge sharing and comparison of voiceprints, leading to vulnerabilities in authentication systems as plaintext voiceprints can be accessed maliciously during storage and transit, compromising privacy across multiple communicating parties.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that allows encrypted voiceprints to be shared and compared without revealing the unencrypted voiceprints, using cryptographic protocols like Diffie-Hellman key exchange and elliptical curve cryptography to calculate similarity scores between encrypted voiceprints, ensuring each party only accesses its own plaintext voiceprints and maintains privacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If plaintext voiceprints are stored and transmitted for comparison, then authentication accuracy is improved, but security and privacy are compromised due to malicious access during storage and transit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidsecurity vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces encrypted voiceprint models as an intermediary representation. Instead of directly sharing and comparing plaintext voiceprints, the system uses encrypted models that can be mathematically compared without revealing the underlying voiceprint data. This mediator enables authentication functionality while maintaining security throughout storage and transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms voiceprints from plaintext format to encrypted model format, changing the parameter state of the data. The encrypted voiceprint models contain the necessary information for comparison and authentication but exist in a transformed state that prevents direct malicious access to the original voiceprint information during storage and transit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If encrypted voiceprint models are used for sharing, then security is improved, but the ability to perform comparison operations deteriorates without access to plaintext

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidcomparison capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of decrypting voiceprints for comparison with a cryptographic mathematical system. Encrypted voiceprint models can be directly compared using encrypted comparison operations and similarity scoring functions that work on encrypted data, eliminating the need to mechanically decrypt the voiceprints to perform comparisons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters by implementing cryptographic comparison operations that work directly on encrypted data. Instead of requiring plaintext for comparison, the system uses encrypted comparison models and similarity scores that operate in the encrypted domain, maintaining both security and comparison capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple parties share voiceprints for authentication, then authentication functionality is improved, but privacy preservation deteriorates as parties gain knowledge of each other's voiceprints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication functionalityVSAvoidprivacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses encrypted voiceprint models as intermediaries that enable multiple parties to perform authentication operations without directly exposing their actual voiceprints. Each party can contribute to the authentication process using their encrypted models, and the system can compute similarity scores and verify identities without any party gaining knowledge of the other parties' plaintext voiceprints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the authentication process into separate cryptographic operations that can be performed independently on encrypted data. Each party's voiceprint remains segmented and encrypted throughout the process, with only the necessary cryptographic computations performed on the encrypted representations, preventing information leakage while maintaining authentication functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10873461B2Zero-knowledge multiparty secure sharing of voiceprints
Publication Date: 2020.12.22 PINDROP SECURITY INC
  • US10873461B2 patent drawing
  • US10873461B2 patent drawing
  • US10873461B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are embodiments of systems and methods for zero-knowledge multiparty secure sharing of voiceprints. In an embodiment, an illustrative computer may receive, through a remote server, a plurality of encrypted voiceprints. When the computer receives an incoming call, the computer may generate a plaintext i-vector of the incoming call. Using the plaintext i-vector and the encrypted voiceprints, the computer may generate one or more encrypted comparison models. The remote server may decrypt the encrypted comparison model to generate similarity scores between the plaintext i-vector and the plurality of encrypted voiceprints.