Encryption-Based Shared Architecture for Content Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional website classification processes are labor-intensive and lack secure encrypted identification of classifiers, making it difficult to enforce acceptable use policies (AUPs) across millions of online merchants and ensuring compliance within a consensus-building framework.

Innovation Solution

An encryption-based architecture using private and public cryptographic signature keys to generate and share audit records, allowing for secure and unique identification of website content, enabling consensus content evaluation through cryptographically signed records stored on a blockchain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional classification processes are used, then website content can be evaluated, but the process becomes labor-intensive and lacks secure identification of classifiers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure identification of classifiersVSAvoidclassification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human classification processes with an automated system that uses machine learning classifiers and cryptographic verification. The mechanical/human effort of evaluating websites is substituted with automated computational processes that maintain security through cryptographic signature keys and audit records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces cryptographic signature keys and audit records as intermediaries between the classification process and the verification process. These intermediaries provide secure identification of classifiers without requiring direct human intervention or complex manual verification procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual evaluation by human classifiers is used, then content assessment can be performed, but resource consumption increases and duplication of efforts occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification efficiencyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates cryptographic copies of classification results through audit records that can be verified without re-evaluating the content. Instead of having multiple human classifiers independently assess the same website (wasting resources), the system generates verifiable cryptographic proofs that can be checked efficiently by multiple parties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs classification and generates cryptographic audit records in advance, allowing multiple entities to verify the results without repeating the resource-intensive classification process. The preliminary action of creating verifiable records eliminates the need for duplicate evaluation efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If secure encrypted identification is implemented, then classifier identity is preserved, but the architecture requires cryptographic key management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassifier identity verificationVSAvoidcryptographic key management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal cryptographic architecture where signature keys and audit records serve multiple functions: identifying classifiers, verifying their credentials, preserving their anonymity, and enabling consensus building. This multi-functional approach reduces the need for separate complex systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The cryptographic system is designed to be self-verifying through mathematical properties of public-key cryptography. The audit records contain embedded verification mechanisms that allow any party to independently verify classifier identity without requiring a central authority or complex key management infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If consensus building across multiple entities is enabled, then AUP compliance is ensured, but the system requires shared architecture for information sharing

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAUP compliance enforcementVSAvoidshared architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges classification results, verification mechanisms, and consensus building into a unified cryptographic architecture. Audit records combine classification data with cryptographic proofs, allowing multiple entities to share and verify information through a single integrated system rather than separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses cryptographic audit records as intermediaries that enable information sharing between multiple entities without requiring them to directly trust each other or share sensitive information. The audit records mediate the consensus-building process by providing verifiable evidence that can be independently assessed by all parties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11443310B2Encryption based shared architecture for content classification
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 PAYPAL INC
  • US11443310B2 patent drawing
  • US11443310B2 patent drawing
  • US11443310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Encryption operations using private and public cryptographic signature keys may be used to facilitate secure and uniquely identifiable audit records relating to website content classification. Blockchain may be used to facilitate collection, storage, and sharing of encrypted audit records. Based on shared encrypted information (e.g. from the blockchain or elsewhere) a content evaluation consensus may be formed. Collections of encrypted audit records may be processed and results of the processing may also be shared via the blockchain. Subsequent operations can include sharing of the processing results.