Encryption Algorithm Hopping With Nested Layers Against Quantum Attacks
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing encryption methods are susceptible to attacks, particularly with the advent of quantum computing, and require costly and time-consuming updates, posing a challenge for secure communications over extended periods in machines with long lifetimes.
Innovation Solution
Implement encryption hopping with multiple encryption protocols and nested encryption to complicate attacks, making them impractical and extend the time before encryption updates are needed, applicable in hardware and software for various devices and networks.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If traditional encryption protocols are used, then encryption security is provided, but the encryption becomes susceptible to attacks particularly with quantum computing
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic encryption by switching between multiple encryption algorithms based on time, data characteristics, or security threats. The system transitions from static single-algorithm encryption to dynamic multi-algorithm encryption, making the encryption scheme adaptable to changing security landscapes including quantum computing threats.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the encryption parameter by using multiple different encryption algorithms instead of a single fixed algorithm. This parameter change allows the system to counter various attack vectors including quantum computing by varying the cryptographic parameters used for encryption.
2Reliability
If encryption protocols are updated to counter new attacks, then security is improved, but the update process is expensive and time-consuming
Solution Approach 1:
The patent incorporates multiple encryption algorithms in advance within the system before attacks occur. This preliminary preparation allows the system to switch to more secure algorithms without requiring time-consuming updates when threats emerge, as the alternative algorithms are already embedded in the system.
Solution Approach 2:
The system dynamically selects which encryption algorithm to use based on current security requirements, allowing rapid adaptation to new threats without the need for lengthy update processes. The dynamic nature enables quick switching between algorithms to counter emerging attacks.
3Ease of manufacture
If a single encryption method is used, then implementation is simple, but the encryption will eventually fail regardless of difficulty
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the encryption function by implementing multiple separate encryption algorithms within the system. Instead of relying on a single encryption method, the system divides the encryption function into multiple algorithmic components that can be selectively applied, thereby preventing any single method from failing permanently.
Solution Approach 2:
The system achieves multi-functionality by supporting multiple encryption algorithms, making it universally applicable to various security scenarios. This multi-functional approach ensures that the encryption system can adapt to different threats and maintain reliability over extended periods without being vulnerable to a single attack vector.
4Reliability
If multiple encryption algorithms are implemented, then resistance to attacks is improved, but the system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system uses dynamic selection mechanisms to choose the appropriate encryption algorithm based on current security requirements and data characteristics. This dynamic approach allows the system to manage complexity by only activating the necessary algorithms for each specific encryption operation, rather than requiring all algorithms to be actively used simultaneously.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies different encryption algorithms to different parts of the data or different encryption contexts, known as local quality. This allows the system to use multiple algorithms without requiring all algorithms to be applied everywhere, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high attack resistance where needed.
Data Source
AI summary
An exemplary apparatus for providing secure communications includes a processor; memory in electronic communication with the processor; an output in electronic communication with the processor; and instructions stored in memory and executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to store encryption protocols and at least one encryption hopping protocol; perform nested encryption of at least some of the data by selecting a number of layers of encryption to apply to data to be transmitted; selecting at least one encryption hopping protocol; encrypting data associated with one layer of encryption with one of the encryption protocols according to the selected encryption hopping protocol, and repeating the encrypting data instructions for each layer of encryption; and then transmit data from one device to at least one other device utilizing the selected encryption hopping protocol.