Surgical End Effector Articulation for Faster Repositioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical staplers face challenges in efficiently repositioning the end effector during procedures, requiring manual activation of release mechanisms and reorientation, which can be time-consuming and inconvenient for surgeons.

Innovation Solution

The development of a powered surgical instrument with a motor-driven articulation system and a retraction assembly that allows for precise control of the end effector's position and orientation, facilitated by a motor-powered articulation mechanism and a retraction system that automatically returns the drive beam to its initial position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual release mechanism is used to reposition end effector, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases and loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepositioning speedVSAvoidarticulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical release mechanism with an automated motor-driven articulation system. The motor assembly receives electronic signals to automatically pivot the anvil and reposition the end effector, eliminating the need for manual activation and significantly improving repositioning speed and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The motor-driven system performs preliminary positioning actions automatically before the surgeon needs to intervene. The system can pre-position the end effector or automatically return it to initial position, reducing procedural time and allowing the surgeon to focus on critical surgical tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If motor-driven articulation system is implemented, then ease of operation improves and productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend effector controlVSAvoidpowered system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor-driven articulation system operates autonomously based on electronic signals, performing repositioning tasks without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by automatically controlling the anvil movement and end effector positioning, improving ease of operation while the complexity is managed through automated control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The motor-driven articulation system provides multiple functions: it can pivot the anvil, reposition the end effector, and automatically return components to initial positions. This multi-functionality improves ease of operation across various surgical tasks while the integrated design manages the inherent complexity through unified control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If automated retraction assembly is added, then loss of time is reduced and productivity improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepositioning timeVSAvoidretraction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor-driven retraction assembly automatically returns the drive beam to its initial position before subsequent surgical actions are required. This preliminary repositioning action eliminates time loss between surgical steps and ensures the instrument is ready for the next operation without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manual retraction mechanism is replaced with an automated motor-driven retraction assembly. The motor receives electronic signals to automatically retract and reposition the drive beam, significantly reducing the time required for repositioning operations while the integrated control system manages the added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables quicker and more precise repositioning of the end effector, reducing procedural time and enhancing surgical efficiency by automating the reorientation process.

Implementation Method 1

a motor assembly that, in response to receiving an electronic signal, pivots the anvil about the articulation axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a retraction assembly that moves the drive beam back to its initial position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS12053176B2End effector detention systems for surgical instruments
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
  • US12053176B2 patent drawing
  • US12053176B2 patent drawing
  • US12053176B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A surgical instrument system can comprise a surgical instrument, a first end effector, and a second end effector, wherein the end effectors are attachable to the surgical instrument. The first end effector can comprise a first set of stored data pertaining to the first end effector, wherein the surgical instrument is configured to ascertain the first set of data and enter a first operating state. The second end effector can comprise a second set of stored data pertaining to the second end effector, wherein the surgical instrument is configured to ascertain the second set of data and enter a second operating state. The surgical instrument is further configured to enter a default operating state if said surgical instrument is unable to ascertain a set of stored data from an end effector.