End Effector Control via Dual Mechanism Error Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional control systems for machines, such as construction and forestry equipment, face limitations in accuracy and precision due to factors like joint wear, sensor accuracy, structural deflection, and loss of line-of-sight, which hinder precise movement and positioning of work implements.

Innovation Solution

A control system comprising a first and second control mechanism, where the second mechanism is independently controlled to compensate for errors, utilizing a Stewart platform or optical systems for precise movement, and incorporating total stations or computer vision for accurate positioning, allowing for high-precision control of end effectors with at least six degrees of freedom.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional control systems use on-board sensors and global referencing hardware, then the system can provide sufficient precision for basic tasks, but accuracy and precision are limited by joint wear, sensor accuracy, structural deflection, and other factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into two independent control mechanisms: a first control mechanism for coarse positioning and a second control mechanism for fine positioning. This segmentation allows each mechanism to be optimized for its specific function, with the second mechanism compensating for errors from the first, thereby improving overall measurement precision without requiring a single overly complex system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A reference point on the end effector serves as an intermediary element that is tracked by both control mechanisms. This reference point enables the second control mechanism to measure and compensate for positioning errors relative to the desired location, improving accuracy without directly modifying the first control mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If a single control mechanism is used to move the end effector, then the system structure is simpler, but it cannot achieve high accuracy and precision required for digital programmability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement precisionVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control mechanism is segmented into two independent parts: a first control mechanism for general movement and a second control mechanism for precision adjustment. This allows the system to achieve manufacturing precision comparable to high-precision robots and rigid gantry cranes by combining coarse and fine control capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second control mechanism adds a dimension of control independence, allowing it to operate separately from the first control mechanism. This dimensional separation enables error compensation in multiple degrees of freedom, improving movement precision without requiring complete redesign of the original control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If the second control mechanism is independently controlled, then error compensation and high precision positioning are achieved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the actual position of the reference point and compares it with the desired location. This feedback loop enables the second control mechanism to automatically compensate for positioning errors by adjusting its control signals, thereby improving measurement precision through real-time error correction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The second control mechanism serves itself by independently determining the actual position of the reference point and autonomously calculating the necessary corrections. This self-service capability reduces the need for complex external control systems while maintaining high position accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8644964B2Method and system for controlling movement of an end effector on a machine
Publication Date: 2014.02.04 DEERE & CO
  • US8644964B2 patent drawing
  • US8644964B2 patent drawing
  • US8644964B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method of controlling movement of a reference point on an end effector of a machine, where the machine includes a controller, a first control mechanism, and a second control mechanism. The method includes initiating a movement of the reference point to a desired location with the first control mechanism. The method also includes determining an actual position of the reference point and communicating the actual position of the reference point to the controller. A second control mechanism controls the movement of the reference point to the desired location.