Three-Tooth End Mill Geometry for Burr and Chatter Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing end mills face challenges in suppressing burr and delamination, particularly in carbon fiber reinforced materials, due to issues with chip retention and vibration, and previous designs with alternate helical teeth either restrict machining conditions or fail to effectively suppress burr and chatter vibration.

Innovation Solution

An end mill design featuring three types of teeth - right-handed helical, left-handed helical, and curved teeth, with each adjacent pair being different, and a specific arrangement of helix angles and spacing to vary cutting forces and prevent resonance, while the curved teeth help in suppressing burr and chatter vibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If herringbone-shaped end mill with alternate helical teeth is used, then burr suppression is improved, but machining conditions are restricted due to chip retention in overlapping portions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveburrVSAvoidmachining conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the overlap regions between right-handed and left-handed helical teeth by controlling helix angles and tooth geometry locally. The overlapping portions are designed with specific helix angle combinations that prevent chip retention while maintaining the burr-suppressing cutting action, thereby improving machining conditions without sacrificing burr suppression performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies critical parameters including helix angles (α and β both within 1° to 15°), tooth arrangement patterns, and overlap region geometries to eliminate chip retention issues. By optimizing these parameters, the patent maintains effective burr suppression while expanding usable machining conditions and improving chip evacuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If peripheral cutting edges cut with obtuse angles, then ease of operation is improved, but burr suppression deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting operationVSAvoidburr
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates different cutting angle conditions at different locations on the peripheral cutting edges. By optimizing helix angles and tooth geometries locally, the patent achieves acute cutting angles at the effective cutting portions for burr suppression while maintaining favorable cutting conditions through the overall tooth configuration and arrangement pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240001463A1End mill
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 OSG
  • US20240001463A1 patent drawing
  • US20240001463A1 patent drawing
  • US20240001463A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An end mill includes a plurality of peripheral cutting edges that are defined by three types of teeth including a right-handed helical tooth that is twisted rightward, a left-handed helical tooth that is twisted leftward, and a curved tooth which is twisted in a direction reversed right and left on a way thereof and which has a curved shape curved in an arcuate or arched manner in a development view of an outer circumferential surface of the end mill around an axis such that a corresponding one of the peripheral cutting edges is provided on a concave side of the curved shape. Each adjacent pair of the peripheral cutting edges adjacent to each other are defined by the respective teeth that are different in type from each other.