End Mill Rake Face Segmentation for Chip Control and Tool Life

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional end mills face challenges in tool life, surface finish, and cutting forces, particularly in complex stress conditions due to inadequate chip formation and coolant supply, which affect their performance in machining operations.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a cylindrical body with a clamping region and a cutting region featuring multiple flutes, peripheral cutting edges, and end cutting edges defined by multiple rake faces at varying axial and radial angles, enhancing chip formation and tool life through improved manufacturing processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional end mill designs are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but tool life and cutting performance deteriorate under complex stresses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool lifeVSAvoidrake surface configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The end cutting edge is divided into multiple segments, each with its own independent rake surface (first rake surface, second rake surface, third rake surface). This segmentation allows each portion of the cutting edge to have optimized chip formation geometry tailored to specific cutting conditions, improving tool life and performance under complex stresses while maintaining manufacturability through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different rake surfaces are assigned to different portions of the end cutting edge based on their specific functional requirements. The first rake surface addresses chip formation at one portion, the second rake surface addresses another portion, and the third rake surface addresses a third portion. This local optimization ensures that each area of the cutting edge performs its specific function efficiently, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If single rake surface design is used, then manufacturing process is simple, but chip formation and coolant supply are inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting performanceVSAvoidnumber of rake surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting edge is segmented into multiple portions, each equipped with a dedicated rake surface (first, second, and third rake surfaces). This segmentation enables independent optimization of chip formation for each portion, significantly improving cutting performance and coolant access to the cutting zone while keeping the overall design manageable through systematic arrangement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single rake surface design to a multi-dimensional rake surface configuration where multiple rake surfaces are arranged at different angular positions around the end cutting edge. This dimensional expansion allows simultaneous optimization of chip formation and coolant supply across multiple cutting zones, resolving the contradiction between productivity and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If cutting corners are under complex stresses, then machining versatility is maintained, but tool life deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining capabilityVSAvoidcutting corner integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Each cutting corner and portion of the end cutting edge is equipped with a specifically designed rake surface (first, second, or third rake surface) that addresses the local stress conditions and chip formation requirements. This local optimization strengthens cutting corners against complex stresses while maintaining the versatility to handle various machining operations through the collective capability of all rake surfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11253934B2End mill with independent rake surfaces
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 KENNAMETAL INC
  • US11253934B2 patent drawing
  • US11253934B2 patent drawing
  • US11253934B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cutting tool includes: a body extending along a longitudinal axis between a leading and trailing ends, the body having a clamping region disposed at or about the trailing end and a cutting region which extends toward the clamping region from the leading end of the body; a plurality of flutes defined in the body, each extending from the leading end toward the coupling portion; a plurality of peripheral cutting edges, each extending from the leading end toward the coupling portion along a corresponding flute of the plurality of flutes; and a plurality of end cutting edges disposed at the leading end, each end cutting edge extending from at or near the longitudinal axis outward along a corresponding flute. At least one end cutting edge is defined, in-part, by a plurality of rake faces which each extend from a corresponding portion of the one cutting edge into the corresponding flute.