Endoscope Bending Section Segmented Comb Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing endoscope bending sections face challenges in manufacturing when trying to make them longer and thinner, as the narrow passages for pull-wires become prone to failure due to long and thin retractable cores used in the moulding process.

Innovation Solution

The endoscope features a bending section with two elongate parts forming comb-like structures, allowing for a single lumen during injection moulding, using a large single longitudinal core for increased mechanical strength and facilitating assembly by sideways joining of the parts, which simplifies the manufacturing process and reduces stress on the bridges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the bending section is made longer and thinner with increased segments, then the flexibility and manoeuvrability of the endoscope is improved, but the passages for pull-wires become very narrow and the retractable cores become very long and thin, making them more prone to failure

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bending section is divided into two separate elongate parts (first and second bending section parts), each with its own comb-like structure. This segmentation allows each part to be manufactured independently with robust cores, avoiding the reliability issues of single long thin cores while achieving the desired flexibility through the articulated arrangement of multiple segments across both parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bridges of the first bending section part extend in a first direction while the bridges of the second bending section part extend in a second direction transverse to the first direction. This dimensional arrangement allows the pull-wire passages to be oriented in different directions, enabling the use of shorter, more robust retractable cores in each part while maintaining overall flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Shape

If the bending section is made longer and thinner, then the outer diameter is reduced, but the passages for pull-wires become very narrow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveouter diameterVSAvoidpassage complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Dividing the bending section into two separate parts allows the pull-wire passages to be distributed across both parts. Each part can have simpler, wider passages suitable for robust core manufacturing, while the combined structure achieves the required small outer diameter through efficient spatial arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By orienting the bridges and passages in different directions (first direction for first part, second transverse direction for second part), the design accommodates pull-wire passages in multiple dimensions. This allows for larger passage cross-sections in each part while maintaining the overall compact external dimensions of the bending section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If the bridges are just attached as hinges to neighbouring segments, then the assembly is simple, but the bending stresses are concentrated over only the distance between two neighbouring segments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The bridges of the first bending section part and the bridges of the second bending section part are arranged to extend in different directions and work together to provide combined bending support. This merging of bridge functions in perpendicular directions distributes the bending stress across a larger volume of material, enhancing mechanical strength while maintaining the articulated hinge-like flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The bridges extend in two different directions (first direction and second transverse direction), creating a three-dimensional stress distribution network. This dimensional arrangement allows bending stresses to be distributed across both directional axes, significantly improving the mechanical strength and stress resistance of the bending section compared to single-direction hinge attachments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3988006B1An endoscope
Publication Date: 2023.08.09 AMBU AS
  • EP3988006B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3988006B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3988006B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4b

AI summary

An endoscope comprising a handle at the proximal end, an insertion tube connected to the handle. The insertion tube comprises a bending section (6). The bending section (6) comprises a first elongate bending section part (10) and a second elongate bending section part (10'). The first elongate bending section part (10) comprises a number of first annular members (13). The first annular members (13) are arranged in a row and interconnected by a number of first bridges (14) so as to form a first comb-like structure. The second elongate bending section part (10) comprises a number of second annular members (13'). The second annular members (13') are arranged in a row and interconnected by a number of second bridges so as to form a second comb-like structure. The outer circumferential surface of at least some of said first annular members (13) comprise a groove adapted to receive and accommodate a second bridge of said second bending section part (10') and the outer circumferential surface of at least some of said second annular members (13') comprise a groove adapted to receive and accommodate a first bridge (14) of said first bending section part (10).