Endoscopic Submucosal Injection Material Spark Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Endoscopic submucosal injection materials used in EMR and ESD procedures generate sparks, leading to unintended resection of non-lesion areas and contamination of endoscope lenses, and existing materials are not optimal for ease of resection and safety.

Innovation Solution

An endoscopic submucosal injection material comprising a water-soluble resin with a weight-average molecular weight of 10,000 or more, an organic compound with two or more hydroxyl groups and a molecular weight of 400 or less, and water, with electrical conductivity of 500 mS/m or less and an osmotic pressure ratio of 0.7 to 1.5 to physiological saline, which includes glycol, sugar alcohol, or monosaccharide compounds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional endoscopic submucosal injection materials are used, then elevation function is provided, but sparks are generated causing safety risks and contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespark generationVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electrical conductivity parameter of the injection material by selecting specific water-soluble resins with appropriate molecular weights and concentrations, thereby reducing spark generation during high-frequency resection while maintaining the elevation function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the local quality of the injection material by controlling the distribution and concentration of water-soluble resin components to create regions with different electrical conductivity properties, reducing spark generation at the resection site while maintaining elevation elsewhere

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If injection material composition is adjusted for osmotic pressure, then safety is improved, but ease of resection deteriorates due to spark generation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidease of resection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simultaneously optimizes multiple parameters including electrical conductivity, osmotic pressure, and viscosity by adjusting the types and concentrations of water-soluble resins and organic compounds, achieving a balance where safety is maintained through osmotic pressure control while ease of resection is improved by reducing sparks through conductivity control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If water-soluble resin molecular weight is increased, then elevation is improved, but electrical conductivity increases causing more sparks

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveelevationVSAvoidspark generation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the molecular weight parameter of water-soluble resins to achieve appropriate viscosity for elevation while controlling electrical conductivity to minimize sparks, finding an optimal range that balances both requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite formulation with multiple water-soluble resin components having different molecular weights to achieve the desired balance between elevation capability (requiring higher viscosity) and spark reduction (requiring lower electrical conductivity)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The material improves safety, ease of resection, and elevation by inhibiting spark generation and water movement, reducing the risk of dehydration or cell death, and enhancing the viscosity for better mucosal elevation.

Implementation Method 1

the endoscopic submucosal injection material has an electrical conductivity of 500 mS/m or less

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conductivity control: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

an osmotic pressure ratio of the endoscopic submucosal injection material to physiological saline is 0.7 to 1.5

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOsmotic pressure: Osmotic Pressure

Implementation Method 3

a water-soluble resin having a weight-average molecular weight of 10,000 or more

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscosity enhancement through polymer molecular weight: Viscometer

Data Source

PatentUS20240123125A1Endoscopic submucosal injection material
Publication Date: 2024.04.18 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US20240123125A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An endoscopic submucosal injection material containing: a water-soluble resin having a weight-average molecular weight of 10,000 or more; an organic compound having two or more hydroxyl groups and having a molecular weight of 400 or less; and water is provided, in which the endoscopic submucosal injection material has an electrical conductivity of 500 mS/m or less, and an osmotic pressure ratio of the endoscopic submucosal injection material to physiological saline is 0.7 to 1.5.