Endoscopic Lesion Inference Using Accuracy-Driven Model Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies for endoscopic examination systems fail to effectively address the variability in the user's requirements for specific issues within a certain technical area that existing technologies have not addressed or effectively solved. These are the challenges or needs the patent application aims to tackle.

Innovation Solution

An image processing device that includes a first acquisition means to acquire a set value of a first index indicating accuracy relating to lesion analysis, a second acquisition means to acquire a predicted value of a second index for each of plural models, and an inference means to make inference regarding the lesion based on the predicted value and plural models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single lesion detection model is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to different user requirements for accuracy indices deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user requirementsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects among multiple pre-trained lesion detection models based on user-defined accuracy requirements. Instead of using a fixed single model, the system adapts its model selection in real-time according to the specific accuracy indices (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) that the user prioritizes for their examination needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by selecting different models with varying performance characteristics (different accuracy profiles) based on user specifications. Each model has been trained to optimize for different accuracy indices, and the system adjusts which model is deployed by changing the selection criterion according to user input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple lesion detection models are used to satisfy different user requirements, then the adaptability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user requirementsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple lesion detection models are pre-trained in advance, each optimized for different accuracy indices (e.g., one model for high sensitivity, another for high specificity). This preliminary preparation allows the system to quickly select the appropriate pre-trained model based on user requirements without needing to train models on-demand, thereby managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary model selection mechanism that acts as a mediator between user requirements and the actual lesion detection process. This intermediary layer evaluates user-defined accuracy indices and selects the most appropriate pre-trained model, simplifying the interface between diverse user needs and multiple specialized models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the lesion detection model is optimized for high sensitivity, then the detection rate improves, but the false positive rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelesion detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different models are specialized for different performance characteristics: some models are locally optimized for high sensitivity (detecting all possible lesions), while others are optimized for high specificity (minimizing false positives). The system selects the model with the appropriate local quality (performance profile) based on the user's priorities for the current examination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the trade-off between sensitivity and false positive rate by selecting different models based on user-defined accuracy indices. If the user prioritizes minimizing false positives, the system selects a model optimized for specificity rather than sensitivity, thereby dynamically adjusting the operational characteristics to match user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12602782B2Image processing device, image processing method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 NEC CORP
  • US12602782B2 patent drawing
  • US12602782B2 patent drawing
  • US12602782B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The image processing device 1X includes a first acquisition means 30X, a second acquisition means 31X, and an inference means 33X. The first acquisition means 30X acquires a set value of a first index indicating an accuracy relating to a lesion analysis. The second acquisition means 31X acquires, for each of plural models which make inference regarding a lesion, a predicted value of a second index, which is an index of the accuracy other than the first index, on an assumption that the set value of the first index is satisfied. The inference means 33X makes inference regarding the lesion included in an endoscopic image of an examination target, based on the predicted value of the second index and the plural models.