Endoscopic Manipulator Guide Insert Friction Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing manipulators, particularly endoscopic ones, face challenges with high friction and wear due to flexible force transmission elements with large surface areas and high flexibility, leading to increased risk of damage and reduced precision in delicate operations.

Innovation Solution

A guide insert within the shaft guides a pull or push rod with a constant or location-independent cross-section, reducing friction and wear, and featuring alternating support and flexible sections or a helical structure to enhance flexibility and reduce stress concentrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a flexible force transmission element with large surface area is used, then flexibility is improved, but friction and wear increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidfriction and wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a thin-walled tubular guide insert structure that provides flexibility while maintaining a small cross-sectional area. The thin walls allow the structure to bend and adapt to curved paths without requiring a large surface area, thereby reducing friction and wear compared to traditional flexible elements with larger cross-sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The guide insert features locally reinforced sections at critical stress points while maintaining thin walls in other areas. This localized strengthening provides necessary structural integrity and resistance to wear at high-stress regions without increasing the overall surface area that contacts the shaft, thus balancing flexibility with reduced friction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the cross-section of the transmission element is reduced to minimize friction, then friction is reduced, but strength and resistance to damage decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefrictionVSAvoidresistance to damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The tubular guide insert utilizes a thin-walled structure that maintains small cross-sectional area to minimize friction with the shaft, while the tubular geometry itself provides inherent structural strength and resistance to damage. The hollow cylindrical form distributes stresses effectively without requiring large material cross-sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The guide insert is constructed from composite materials that provide high strength-to-weight ratio and high strength-to-cross-sectional-area ratio. These materials enable the structure to maintain small dimensions for reduced friction while simultaneously providing sufficient strength and damage resistance through superior material properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If a helical or flexible structure is used to increase flexibility, then adaptability is improved, but stress concentrations and crack risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidcrack resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The thin-walled tubular structure provides flexibility through its geometric configuration and material properties rather than through helical winding or sharp bends. The smooth continuous tubular geometry avoids stress concentrations that would arise from helical structures, maintaining reliability while achieving the necessary flexibility for curved shaft applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The guide insert incorporates localized geometric features and material property variations at specific sections to enhance flexibility where needed while maintaining uniform, stress-distributing geometry in other areas. This prevents stress concentrations and crack initiation while providing the required adaptability for curved paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design allows for more precise and sensitive operations with reduced risk of damage, as the small cross-section of the transmission element minimizes static friction and wear, while the flexible sections accommodate curvature and reduce the likelihood of cracks.

Implementation Method 1

the small cross-section of the transmission element minimizes static friction and wear

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

the flexible sections accommodate curvature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2253282B1Endoscopic manipulator
Publication Date: 2013.08.14 KARL STORZ SE & CO KG
  • EP2253282B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5

AI summary

A manipulator (10) comprises a proximal end (11), a distal end (12) with a manipulation device (50), a shaft (30) between the proximal end (11) and the distal end (12), and a transmission element (40) for transmitting at least either a force or a movement between the proximal end (11) and the distal end (12). A guide insert (60) for guiding the transmission element (40) is provided in the shaft (30), wherein the transmission element (40) is displaceable relative to the guide insert (60) in the longitudinal direction of the shaft (30).