Endoscopic Stone Identification for Controlled Fragment Sizing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lithotripsy devices lack the ability to accurately control stone fragment size during urinary stone fragmentation, leading to inefficient treatment times due to unpredictable fragment sizes and the need for repeated removal and fragmentation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that uses an imaging element mounted on a scope to transmit image data, generate a visual representation, establish a scale, determine stone size, and augment the representation with indicators for removal status, allowing precise control over stone fragment size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If laser energy is used to fragment stones, then stone fragmentation is achieved, but stone fragment size cannot be controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestone fragment size controlVSAvoidlaser fragmentation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of stone size using imaging elements (camera, ultrasound, or other sensors) before applying laser energy. This allows the operator to know the initial stone dimensions and adjust laser parameters accordingly to achieve desired fragment sizes, preventing both excessive fragmentation and insufficient breakdown

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors stone fragment size during and after laser treatment using imaging elements. This feedback is displayed to the operator in real-time, allowing adjustment of laser energy parameters to achieve target fragment sizes. The system can detect when fragments have reached the desired size range and signal when treatment should be stopped

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If surgeon estimates stone size from low resolution image, then stone size assessment is obtained, but measurement accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestone size measurementVSAvoidimage resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer between the imaging element and the surgeon. Image processing algorithms enhance low-resolution images by filtering noise, adjusting contrast, and applying edge detection techniques. This intermediary processing recovers measurement information that would otherwise be lost in low-resolution images, enabling accurate stone size assessment without requiring high-resolution imaging

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the imaging system dynamically. When stone size measurement is required, the system adjusts imaging parameters such as exposure time, gain, and focal length to maximize the information content in low-resolution images. The system may also switch between different imaging modes (optical, ultrasound, other sensing modalities) depending on the measurement requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If retrieval device is introduced based on estimated stone size, then stone removal is attempted, but treatment time increases due to repeated procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficiencyVSAvoidrepeated removal and fragmentation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement and assessment of stone size and fragment characteristics before attempting stone removal. Based on these measurements, the system pre-selects the appropriate retrieval device size and type, and determines the optimal fragmentation strategy. This preliminary planning prevents the need for repeated device introductions and adjustments during the procedure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously provides feedback on fragment size and characteristics during the procedure. When fragments reach the removable size threshold, the system signals readiness for removal. This real-time feedback eliminates the need for conservative over-fragmentation and repeated assessments, allowing the operator to proceed directly to removal with the appropriate device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12357150B2Stone identification methods and systems
Publication Date: 2025.07.15 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED INC
  • US12357150B2 patent drawing
  • US12357150B2 patent drawing
  • US12357150B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of stone identification methods and systems are described. According to one aspect, an exemplary method comprises: transmitting to a processing unit, with an imaging element mounted on a distal end of a scope, image data about a stone object inside a body cavity; generating from the image data, with the processing unit, a visual representation of the stone object and the body cavity; establishing from a user input, with the processing unit, a scale for the visual representation; determining from the visual representation, with the processing unit, a size of the stone object on the scale; comparing, with the processing unit, the size of the stone object with a predetermined maximum size to determine a removal status; and augmenting, with the processing unit, the visual representation to include an indicator responsive to the removal status. Associated systems are also described.