Endoscopy Video Quality Feedback for Real-Time Area Coverage Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical imaging systems fail to provide real-time analysis and feedback on the quality of an operator's examination technique during procedures like endoscopy, lacking evaluation of individual areas and the entire procedure, which can lead to missed detections due to operator skill, fatigue, or memory issues.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system processes video frames from medical procedures to analyze examination quality by evaluating factors such as trajectory, speed, and surface exposure, providing real-time graphical feedback on examination quality levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If real-time analysis and feedback systems are implemented to evaluate examination quality, then detection accuracy and operator skill improvement are improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexamination quality assessmentVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by analyzing video frames during the endoscopic procedure and providing quality assessment metrics to the operator. The processor evaluates examination quality based on multiple parameters including area coverage, trajectory patterns, and inspection duration, then displays feedback information that guides the operator to improve their examination technique immediately during the procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computer vision system that acts as a mediator between the raw video feed from the endoscope and the quality assessment requirements. This intermediary layer processes video frames to extract relevant features, generates quality metrics, and provides feedback without requiring direct modification of the endoscopic equipment itself, thereby managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive analysis of multiple factors (trajectory, speed, surface exposure) is performed to evaluate examination quality, then assessment accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexamination quality evaluation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining quality metrics and analysis parameters before the actual examination procedure begins. The processor is pre-configured with evaluation criteria for trajectory, speed, and surface exposure, allowing it to rapidly process video frames during the procedure without requiring complex real-time decision-making about what to measure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the examination quality assessment into distinct analytical components: trajectory analysis, speed evaluation, surface exposure calculation, and area coverage assessment. Each component processes specific aspects of the video data independently, allowing parallel computation and reducing overall processing time while maintaining comprehensive evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the system provides detailed real-time feedback on operator performance, then operator skill and examination thoroughness are improved, but information processing load and system resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexamination thoroughnessVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality assessment by providing targeted feedback specific to the current examination context and operator performance. Rather than continuously analyzing all possible parameters at full resolution, the processor focuses computational resources on evaluating the most relevant quality metrics for the current procedural stage and identified performance gaps, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4412554B1Computer-implemented systems and methods for analyzing examination quality for an endoscopic procedure
Publication Date: 2025.12.03 COSMO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AI LTD
  • EP4412554B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4412554B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4412554B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A computer-implemented system is provided that includes at least one processor that is adapted to analyze a plurality of frames from a real-time video to identify frames during which an operator is interacting with an image device to examine areas of a patient. The at least one processor is further configured to generate, from the identified frames, data representations of a first area examined by the operator interacting with the image device and further generate data representations of one or more further areas examined by the operator interacting with the image device. The at least one processor is also configured to aggregate the data representations of the first area with the data representations of the one or more further areas and determine, using the aggregated data representations, an examination quality level of the areas examined by the operator and present, on a display device during the medical procedure, a graphical representation indicating the examination quality level of the areas examined by the operator.