Endpoint Access Control for PCIe IDE Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security methods for high-speed interconnect technologies, such as PCIe, face challenges in controllability and performance, particularly in maintaining data integrity and confidentiality while minimizing overhead.

Innovation Solution

Integrating selective components of the Integrity and Data Encryption (IDE) mechanism into the Access Control Services (ACS) framework at endpoint devices, focusing on key setup and exchange without full encryption, to enhance security and reduce performance penalties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If full IDE encryption mechanism is implemented, then data integrity and confidentiality are improved, but computational overhead and performance penalties increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrity and confidentialityVSAvoidcomputational overhead and performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and implements only the essential access control and authentication components of IDE into the ACS framework, separating these from the full encryption mechanism. This allows security functionality to be maintained while excluding the computationally intensive encryption operations, thereby resolving the contradiction between security reliability and computational performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the IDE mechanism into distinct functional components: access control services, key setup and exchange, and authentication. By implementing only the necessary components for security establishment rather than the complete encryption pipeline, the system achieves security functionality with reduced computational overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If selective IDE components are integrated into ACS framework, then performance penalties are reduced, but security coverage may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveperformanceVSAvoidsecurity coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing only the necessary subset of IDE components (access control, key exchange, authentication) rather than the complete encryption mechanism. This partial implementation provides sufficient security coverage for the intended use case while avoiding the performance penalties of full IDE, achieving an optimal balance between security and performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If key setup and exchange component is established, then authentication security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication securityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the key setup and exchange functionality directly into the existing ACS framework, combining authentication security features with access control services. This integration eliminates the need for separate, complex authentication subsystems while maintaining strong security, thereby reducing overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250125953A1System for access control
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20250125953A1 patent drawing
  • US20250125953A1 patent drawing
  • US20250125953A1 patent drawing

AI summary

systems, computer program products, and methods are described for an endpoint device configured for secure data transmission within a network. An example endpoint device may include a network interface configured to receive a communication request from a peer endpoint device, and an access control unit configured to determine whether a peer endpoint device is IDE qualified based on the communication request. If the peer endpoint device is IDE qualified, the access control unit authorizes the communication request, allowing secure communication between the devices. If the peer endpoint device is not IDE qualified, the access control unit transmits the communication request to a root port for further authorization, verifying that only IDE-qualified devices are permitted to communicate directly.