Endpoint Agent for Email Threat Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cyber defense systems, including firewalls and antivirus methods, are insufficient in addressing the evolving nature of cyber threats, particularly those originating from or associated with email systems.

Innovation Solution

A cyber defense system incorporating an endpoint agent extension with multiple modules and machine learning models that integrates with email client applications to detect and respond autonomously to email threats by analyzing user behavior and email activity, preventing data exfiltration, and enforcing security policies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional firewalls and antivirus methods are used, then basic security protection is provided, but they are insufficient against evolving email-based cyber threats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protection effectivenessVSAvoidability to address evolving threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts to evolving threats by continuously learning from new email patterns and threat behaviors. The machine learning models are updated in real-time to recognize emerging threat types, allowing the security system to maintain effectiveness against evolving email-based cyber threats without requiring manual reconfiguration of traditional security rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cyber defense system performs self-analysis and self-protection by autonomously evaluating email content, attachments, and metadata using machine learning algorithms. The system automatically identifies and blocks threats without human intervention, and continuously improves its detection capabilities by learning from analyzed threat patterns, making the security system both adaptive and self-sufficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Speed

If autonomous actions are taken automatically by the system, then response time is reduced, but human control and verification are diminished

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat response timeVSAvoidhuman control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where autonomous actions taken against threats are monitored and evaluated. The results of these autonomous responses are fed back into the machine learning models, allowing the system to learn from its decisions and improve future autonomous actions while maintaining accountability through logged feedback loops that can be reviewed by security personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis and classification of emails using machine learning models before taking autonomous actions. This preliminary evaluation prepares the system to respond quickly to confirmed threats while maintaining a record of the analysis process, allowing human operators to review decisions if needed while still benefiting from rapid automated response to clear threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240223523A1Endpoint agent extension of a machine learning cyber defense system for email
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 DARKTRACE HLDG LTD
  • US20240223523A1 patent drawing
  • US20240223523A1 patent drawing
  • US20240223523A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An endpoint agent extension of a cyber defense system for email that includes modules and machine learning models. An integration module integrates with an email client application to detect email cyber threats in emails in the email client application as well as regulate emails. An action module interfaces with the email client application to direct autonomous actions against an outbound email and/or its files when a cyber threat module determines the email and/or its files (a) to be a data exfiltration threat, (b) to be both malicious and anomalous behavior as compared to a user's modeled email behavior, and (c) any combination of these. The autonomous actions can include actions of logging a user off the email client application, preventing the sending of the email, stripping the attached files and/or disabling the link to the files from the email, and sending a notification to cyber security personnel regarding the email.