Endpoint AI File Classification for Dynamic Data Sensitivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional data classification systems are ineffective for general intellectual property content due to the dynamic nature of sensitivity and the challenges in training models without sharing proprietary information, leading to inaccurate classification and potential data breaches.

Innovation Solution

A distributed, artificial-intelligence-driven file classification system that operates on endpoint devices, analyzing file content and metadata locally without transmitting sensitive data, and aggregates anonymized metadata for centralized analysis to refine classification policies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional classification systems use regular expression matching, then they can classify structured data in narrow domains, but they fail to classify general intellectual property content accurately due to dynamic sensitivity and lack of contextual understanding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidadaptability to dynamic sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical pattern-matching systems (regular expressions) with an artificial intelligence-based classification system that uses machine learning models. This substitution enables the system to understand contextual nuances, dynamic sensitivity, and semantic meanings of intellectual property content, thereby achieving both high classification accuracy and adaptability to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts classification parameters and model behavior based on changing conditions such as public disclosures and sensitivity levels. The AI model can learn from new data and update its understanding of what constitutes sensitive intellectual property information, allowing the classification accuracy to be maintained despite changing contextual parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If enterprises train AI models using their intellectual property data, then classification accuracy improves, but proprietary information is exposed to training environments and potential data breaches occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoiddata exposure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a centralized AI training platform as an intermediary between enterprise data and the classification models. This intermediary infrastructure enables model training using enterprise data while implementing security measures to prevent direct exposure of proprietary information to external training environments. The platform acts as a secure mediator that processes data locally and shares only necessary information for model improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of exposing original proprietary data to external training environments, the system creates and uses synthetic copies or representations of the data for training purposes. This allows the AI models to learn from the patterns and characteristics of intellectual property content without actually exposing the sensitive original data to potentially vulnerable training infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If centralized AI training platforms aggregate data from multiple sources, then model accuracy improves, but data transmission and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the data aggregation and processing function into segmented components distributed across multiple sources and processing stages. Rather than a single monolithic centralized platform, the system segments data collection, anonymization, aggregation, and model training into separate functional modules that can operate independently and scale as needed, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and removes sensitive or identifying information from the data before aggregation and training. By taking out proprietary information, personally identifiable data, and other sensitive elements from the raw data streams, the system reduces the complexity of secure processing while still maintaining the useful patterns and features needed for accurate classification models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250371108A1Distributed data object classification
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 INTEL CORP
  • US20250371108A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371108A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371108A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects relate to mechanisms for data object classification in connection with a memory and a processor. At an endpoint device, a classification of a data object is determined based on output from a machine learning model configured to take as input contents and metadata of the data object, wherein the classification comprises a confidence score. It is determined whether the data object requires additional review, based on the confidence score. A data object hash is computed based on the contents and the metadata of the data object. An internal structure of the machine learning model is updated based on the additional review, the data object hash, and subsequent operation of the endpoint device.