Multi-jurisdictional Endpoint Allocation Compliance Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for allocating endpoints across multiple jurisdictions are manual, resource-intensive, and prone to errors due to the complexity of unique compliance regulations in each jurisdiction.

Innovation Solution

A cloud-based multi-jurisdictional endpoint allocation system that automates compliance by maintaining a regulation database with regulation objects for each jurisdiction, performing actions such as form population and submission, and allowing for human intervention when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual compliance processes are used for each jurisdiction, then flexibility and human judgment are maintained, but resource consumption and time requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance process automationVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal compliance framework that handles multiple jurisdictional requirements through a single automated platform. The regulation database stores compliance rules for various jurisdictions, and the system automatically selects and applies the appropriate regulations based on the jurisdiction parameter, eliminating the need for separate manual processes for each jurisdiction while maintaining adaptability to different regulatory environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The compliance process is segmented into distinct automated components: regulation retrieval from the database, form population with customer data, document assembly, and submission. This segmentation allows each step to be handled by specialized automated routines, reducing resource consumption while managing system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If automated compliance processes are implemented, then resource efficiency and speed improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveendpoint allocation speedVSAvoidautomation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-storing compliance regulations, form templates, and submission procedures in the regulation database for multiple jurisdictions. When an endpoint allocation request arrives, the system quickly retrieves and applies the pre-prepared compliance package for the relevant jurisdiction, significantly accelerating the process without requiring complex real-time decision-making logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by retrieving standardized form templates and compliance documentation from the regulation database and populating them with customer-specific data. This approach allows rapid generation of compliance packages without recreating forms from scratch, improving productivity while keeping the automation logic relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If comprehensive compliance checks are performed for all jurisdictions, then compliance accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance accuracyVSAvoidallocation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by retrieving and applying only the compliance regulations specific to the requested jurisdiction rather than performing comprehensive checks for all jurisdictions. The regulation database is organized by jurisdiction, allowing the system to fetch only the relevant compliance package (forms, procedures, requirements) for the specific country or region, ensuring accuracy while minimizing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250126173A1Multi-jurisdictional endpoint allocation compliance
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 TWILIO INC
  • US20250126173A1 patent drawing
  • US20250126173A1 patent drawing
  • US20250126173A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are systems, methods, and non-transitory computer-readable media for multi-jurisdictional endpoint allocation compliance. A multi-jurisdictional endpoint allocation system receives a request to allocate an endpoint in a jurisdiction to an account and accesses a regulation data object for the jurisdiction. The regulation data object identifies a set of jurisdictional requirements for the jurisdiction and a set of actions to be performed to satisfy the set of jurisdictional requirements for the jurisdiction. The multi-jurisdictional endpoint allocation system allocates an endpoint in the jurisdiction to the account and executes the set of actions associated with the regulation data object to satisfy the set of jurisdictional requirements for the jurisdiction.