Endpoint-Specific Diagnostic Plans for Information Handling Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional diagnostic strategies for information handling systems are inefficient and ineffective due to reliance on passive test models and multiple static test algorithms, leading to slow, inaccurate, and costly diagnostics, especially with the increasing complexity and variability of computer systems.

Innovation Solution

A cloud-based diagnostics optimization method and platform that employs machine learning resources to generate endpoint-specific diagnostic plans, prioritizing execution time and frequency, and differentiating between hardware and software issues by utilizing health data from endpoints and operational contexts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If passive test models with multiple static test algorithms are used, then comprehensive device coverage is achieved, but diagnostic execution time increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static test algorithms to dynamic, adaptive diagnostic plans that are generated in real-time based on device health data, operational context, and machine learning predictions. The diagnostic plan changes dynamically according to the specific needs of each device and endpoint, optimizing execution time while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously including test selection, test sequence, execution timing, and resource allocation based on analyzed health data and predictive models. This allows the diagnostic process to adapt its parameters to minimize execution time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive health data collection from all endpoints is performed, then diagnostic accuracy improves, but data processing complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant health data and features needed for specific diagnostic purposes using machine learning models. Rather than processing all collected data uniformly, the system identifies and extracts critical parameters that contribute most to diagnostic accuracy, reducing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized platform performs multiple functions including data collection, analysis, model training, diagnostic plan generation, and execution coordination. This multi-functional approach consolidates complexity into a single system rather than distributing it across multiple components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If endpoint-specific diagnostic plans are generated using machine learning, then diagnostic efficiency and accuracy improve, but computational resource requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary machine learning model training and health data analysis in advance to generate predictive insights and pre-configured diagnostic plans. This preliminary computation reduces the computational burden during actual diagnostic execution, as the heavy lifting is done beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized diagnostic platform acts as an intermediary between endpoint devices and diagnostic execution. It handles the computationally intensive machine learning operations centrally, allowing endpoints to benefit from advanced analytics without bearing the full computational burden themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of manufacture

If traditional static diagnostic algorithms are used across all devices, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to different device configurations and issues decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation easeVSAvoiddiagnostic adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic diagnostic plans that automatically adapt to different device configurations, operational contexts, and detected issues. The machine learning models continuously learn from new data, enabling the system to adapt its diagnostic approach to each specific situation while maintaining a unified implementation framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11797370B2Optimized diagnostics plan for an information handling system
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 DELL PROD LP
  • US11797370B2 patent drawing
  • US11797370B2 patent drawing
  • US11797370B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A diagnostics optimization platform employs cloud-based resources, including a diagnostics repository that accumulates health data from managed endpoints, and machine learning (ML) resources that generate endpoint-specific diagnostic plans based on the accumulated health data. The ML resources may be configured to generate diagnostic plans that prioritize any appropriate diagnostic testing parameter or objective including, as a non-limiting example, a reduction in diagnostic testing execution time and/or diagnostic testing frequency. The ML resources may maintain a continually updated training database derived from the collected health data to develop endpoint-specific data collection and diagnostic testing models. The ML resources may include a diagnostics optimization module to develop diagnostic testing models and provide corresponding endpoint-specific diagnostic plans to each endpoint. The ML resources may further include a data collection module to develop data collection models and generate endpoint-specific data collection plans for each of the managed endpoints.