Endpoint Helper Agent for User-Guided AI Threat Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cyber security systems are insufficient in identifying and responding to complex, evolving cyber threats, particularly suspicious hyperlinks, URLs, and emails, due to their inability to effectively combine human intuition with AI-powered analysis.

Innovation Solution

A host-based endpoint agent facilitates bi-directional communication between users and a cyber security system, allowing users to query suspicious links or URLs directly, leveraging AI models for deeper investigation and reducing resource consumption by filtering benign items.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional firewalls and endpoint security methods are deployed, then basic protection against certain threats is provided, but the system is insufficient against complex modern threats that change over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidability to counter evolving threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic adaptation by continuously learning from new threat data and updating its detection models. The machine learning components are trained on evolving threat patterns, allowing the security system to adapt its behavior and detection capabilities over time rather than relying on static rule sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes its operational parameters by adjusting detection thresholds, analysis depth, and response strategies based on the specific threat being detected. Different threat types trigger different analysis parameters and response mechanisms, allowing the system to optimize its effectiveness for each threat scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If AI-powered analysis is conducted on all potential threats, then identification accuracy improves, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies AI-powered analysis selectively rather than universally. It performs full AI analysis only on items that pass initial filtering and show suspicious characteristics, while applying lighter inspection to benign items. This partial application of intensive analysis maintains accuracy for threats while reducing overall resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary filtering layer between initial threat detection and full AI analysis. This intermediate stage pre-screens potential threats using lighter-weight methods, identifying only the most suspicious items for intensive AI analysis, thereby reducing the volume of data requiring computationally expensive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If comprehensive threat analysis is performed on all items, then threat detection completeness improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection completenessVSAvoidanalysis processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The analysis process is segmented into multiple stages: initial filtering, intermediate screening, and detailed AI analysis. Each stage processes items at different depths, with only suspicious items advancing to subsequent stages. This segmentation maintains comprehensive detection capability while reducing overall processing time by avoiding exhaustive analysis of all items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic analysis with varying intensities rather than continuous full-depth analysis. It performs rapid initial assessments continuously, followed by deeper periodic analysis of suspicious items. This periodic approach with variable intensity maintains detection completeness while optimizing processing time through rhythmically alternating analysis depths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12549566B2Helper agent and system
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 DARKTRACE HLDG LTD
  • US12549566B2 patent drawing
  • US12549566B2 patent drawing
  • US12549566B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the invention relate to a cyber security system that may enable an end user to communicate with a cyber security appliance to identify cyber threats across the client system. The system can include one or more host devices each having a user interface and an endpoint agent for facilitating bi-directional communication between the user and a cyber security appliance. The endpoint agent may include a communication facilitation module including a user interaction module configured to communicate with the user interface and a helper module configured to communicate with the cyber security appliance. The endpoint agent is configured to enable the bi-directional communication between the user interface and the cyber security appliance on receiving a query associated with identified unusual behavior.