Endpoint Tamper Detection via Kernel Cache Instrumentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprise networks face challenges in effectively detecting and mitigating tampering attempts, as existing security measures are inadequate in identifying and remediating threats in real-time, particularly in protecting tamper-protected computing objects.

Innovation Solution

A computer program product that instruments endpoints to detect attempted modifications of tamper-protected computing objects by using a cryptographically secured cache, determines the context and source of the modification, and applies remediation actions such as sandboxing, key revocation, or logging off users to mitigate threats based on threat associations and system configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing security measures are used to detect tampering attempts, then basic protection is provided, but real-time detection and remediation capabilities are inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protection capabilityVSAvoidreal-time detection and remediation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by instrumenting endpoints in advance with tamper detection capabilities, pre-positioning detection mechanisms within the kernel space cache before threats occur. This allows the system to be ready to detect and respond to tampering attempts immediately when they occur, rather than reacting after detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the instrumented endpoints constantly monitor for tampering attempts, detect modifications to computing objects, and trigger automated remediation actions. The feedback mechanism includes monitoring cache accesses, detecting unauthorized modifications, and immediately responding with remediation while logging events for analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive monitoring of computing resources is implemented to detect tampering attempts, then detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetampering detection accuracyVSAvoidsecurity system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer in the form of the kernel space cache that mediates between computing objects and potential tampering attempts. The cache serves as a protected intermediary structure that stores information about tamper-protected objects, allowing detection without requiring complex monitoring of every system component. This intermediary approach simplifies the overall system architecture while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The security system is segmented into distinct functional components: the kernel space cache for storing protected object information, instrumented endpoints for detection, threat management facilities for analysis, and remediation mechanisms for response. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in its function, reducing overall system complexity while improving detection precision through focused monitoring of specific cache entries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Speed

If automated remediation actions are applied in response to tampering attempts, then threat mitigation speed is improved, but risk of false positive impacts increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat remediation speedVSAvoidfalse positive impact
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to verify tampering attempts before applying remediation. The threat management facility receives feedback from instrumented endpoints about detected modifications, analyzes the context and source of attempts, and only triggers remediation when threats are confirmed. This feedback loop reduces false positives while maintaining rapid response to genuine threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis and classification of detected tampering attempts before applying remediation actions. The threat management facility pre-evaluates the nature, source, and context of each attempt, classifying threats based on cached information about computing objects. This preliminary assessment ensures that remediation is applied only to confirmed threats, reducing false positive impacts while maintaining fast response times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12192214B2Mitigating threats associated with tampering attempts
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 SOPHOS LTD
  • US12192214B2 patent drawing
  • US12192214B2 patent drawing
  • US12192214B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An enterprise security system is improved by taking remedial actions responsive to detecting attempts at tampering with computing resources. When a tamper detection instrument detects an attempt at tampering, information about the attempt at tampering may be used to identify one or more candidate types of threats and/or candidate threats. One or more remedial actions associated with the threat or type of threat can be identified and applied in ten enterprise network environment.