Endpoint Validator for Service Mesh Configuration Discrepancies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In distributed computing environments, improperly configured endpoints in service meshes can lead to operational errors, which are challenging to detect and resolve due to complex configuration files and potential discrepancies in service mesh and container orchestration platform settings.

Innovation Solution

An endpoint validator is introduced to determine configuration discrepancies and automatically update settings to resolve operational errors, facilitating prompt detection and handling of issues by comparing configuration settings with platform data and suggesting updates to system administrators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If endpoints are separately configured from services in the service mesh, then flexibility of the service mesh is improved, but complexity of communication and potential failure points increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidcomplexity of communication
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates endpoint configuration from service definition, allowing independent management of communication endpoints. The endpoint configuration file is distinct from service configuration, enabling flexible endpoint management while maintaining clear separation of concerns in the service mesh architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation mechanism that checks endpoint configurations against service definitions. This intermediary layer resolves the complexity by providing a systematic way to validate and coordinate endpoint-service relationships, reducing potential failure points through automated validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If configuration files contain thousands of lines of code with dozens of settings, then comprehensive control over endpoint behavior is achieved, but difficulty in detecting and determining root causes of errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol over endpoint behaviorVSAvoiddifficulty in detecting errors
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a validation mechanism that provides feedback by checking endpoint configurations against service definitions and reporting discrepancies. This feedback system automatically identifies configuration errors and their root causes, making error detection systematic rather than manual searching through thousands of lines of code.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual error detection and analysis with an automated validation system. Instead of manually reviewing configuration files to detect errors, the system automatically validates endpoint configurations, substitutes human analysis with machine-based validation, and identifies root causes programmatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If manual validation of endpoint configurations is performed, then configuration accuracy can be checked, but time required to detect and resolve operational errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidtime to detect and resolve errors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs validation of endpoint configurations as a preliminary action before the service mesh operates. By validating configurations upfront against service definitions and checking for discrepancies in advance, the system ensures configuration accuracy is established before deployment, preventing operational errors rather than detecting them later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11606245B1Validating endpoints in a service mesh of a distributed computing system
Publication Date: 2023.03.14 RED HAT INC
  • US11606245B1 patent drawing
  • US11606245B1 patent drawing
  • US11606245B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Some examples of the present disclosure relate to validating endpoints in a service mesh of a distributed computing environment. In one example, a processor can receive configuration settings applied to an endpoint in a data plane of a service mesh in a distributed computing environment. The processor can receive configuration data associated with a configuration of hardware components and software components in the distributed computing environment. The processor can determine a discrepancy between the configuration settings and the configuration data. The processor can then output the discrepancy for use in resolving an operational error relating to the service mesh.