Handheld Enema Pump With Compression Zones to Prevent Reflux

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing enema devices require significant squeeze force, often causing discomfort and difficulty in self-administration, especially for patients with poor dexterity, and suffer from issues like air mixing with enema liquid, reflux, and the need for reloading.

Innovation Solution

A handheld enema device with a flexible, oval-shaped delivery container acting as a pump, featuring compression zones and a non-return valve to prevent air mixing and reflux, allowing easy one-handed operation without reloading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the resistance to flow is increased to prevent reflux and leakage, then reliability is improved, but the squeeze force required increases making the device harder to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of reflux and leakageVSAvoidsqueeze force required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The delivery container is divided into multiple compression zones with different resistance characteristics. The first compression zone has higher resistance to prevent reflux, while the second compression zone has lower resistance to facilitate easy squeezing and liquid delivery, resolving the contradiction between reliability and ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the delivery container are given different mechanical properties through the compression zones. The first compression zone is designed with higher resistance locally to prevent reflux, while the second compression zone has lower resistance locally to enable easy operation, allowing both requirements to be met in different locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the delivery container is made flexible to enable hand-held pumping, then ease of operation is improved, but control over compression becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand-held pumping capabilityVSAvoidcontrol over compression
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible delivery container is segmented into multiple compression zones that can be independently controlled. This allows the user to apply compression to specific zones as needed, providing control over the pumping action while maintaining the flexibility required for hand-held operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The delivery container is designed as a dynamic system with multiple compression zones that can be compressed in different sequences and to different degrees. This dynamic control allows flexible adaptation to user needs while maintaining manageable complexity through the structured zone design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If the applicator nozzle is made short for simplicity, then device complexity is reduced, but patient comfort deteriorates due to irritation during insertion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicator nozzle designVSAvoidpatient discomfort and irritation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The applicator nozzle is designed with an asymmetric structure featuring a tapered configuration that is wider at the insertion end and narrows toward the tip. This asymmetric design reduces insertion discomfort while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure, resolving the contradiction between device simplicity and patient comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device facilitates comfortable, effective enema administration with reduced force requirements, preventing air mixing and reflux, and enabling self-administration without the need for reloading, thus enhancing user compliance and reducing discomfort.

Implementation Method 1

a non-return valve to prevent air mixing and reflux

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOne-way valve mechanism: Valve

Implementation Method 2

featuring compression zones and a non-return valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical compression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS12533460B2Enema device, and a delivery container for use in said enema device
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 QUFORA AS
  • US12533460B2 patent drawing
  • US12533460B2 patent drawing
  • US12533460B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an enema device comprising a delivery container arranged for accommodating an enema and an applicator nozzle for dispersing the enema, and wherein the delivery container is arranged as a hand held pump and for remaining in an at least partly compressed configuration when the user releases the pressure on said delivery container during use. Thereby is provided a simple, inexpensive and essentially maintenance free enema device which can be used for self-administrating of an enema.