Energy Aware Routing for Wireless Mesh Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wireless mesh networks disproportionately exhaust battery power in centralized nodes, leading to premature power-down and network fragmentation, requiring inefficient multiple truck rolls for battery replacements when nodes deplete at different times.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an energy-aware routing method that computes cost metrics based on battery power levels and route reliability, allowing nodes to select routes that balance battery consumption and reroute packets efficiently in response to failures, thereby distributing traffic load and extending battery life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If routes are selected based solely on reliability, then packet delivery reliability is improved, but battery power consumption in centralized nodes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket delivery reliabilityVSAvoidbattery power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the routing parameter from reliability-only to an energy-aware metric that incorporates both reliability and battery power levels. Nodes compute cost metrics that reflect residual battery power, causing routing decisions to dynamically adapt based on energy status rather than static reliability values alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The routing system transitions from static reliability-based paths to dynamic energy-aware routing. The cost metric for each route changes based on current battery levels, allowing the network to adaptively redistribute traffic as nodes deplete their power, preventing any single node from becoming a permanent bottleneck.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If centralized nodes handle elevated network traffic, then network throughput is improved, but battery exhaustion occurs sooner

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork throughputVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary energy-aware routing decisions before battery exhaustion occurs. By monitoring and incorporating battery power levels into cost metrics, the network proactively redistributes traffic away from nodes approaching depletion, preventing premature node failure and extending overall network operational duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The routing mechanism incorporates feedback from battery power levels into traffic distribution decisions. Nodes continuously assess their energy status and adjust routing costs accordingly, creating a feedback loop that automatically balances load across the network based on real-time power availability, thereby extending battery life while maintaining throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple node batteries are exhausted at different times, then network resilience is improved, but maintenance overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork resilienceVSAvoidmaintenance overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The energy-aware routing system performs preliminary load redistribution to extend battery life across nodes more uniformly. By preventing any single node from exhausting its battery first through proactive routing adjustments, the system coordinates battery depletion timing, reducing the need for multiple separate maintenance visits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If traffic is concentrated through centralized nodes, then routing simplicity is improved, but energy distribution uniformity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting complexityVSAvoidenergy distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the routing parameter from simple reliability metrics to energy-aware cost metrics that incorporate battery power levels. This parameter change maintains routing simplicity while achieving uniform energy distribution, as nodes automatically adjust paths based on energy status without requiring complex centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10420007B2Energy aware routing for mesh networks
Publication Date: 2019.09.17 ITRON NETWORKED SOLUTIONS INC
  • US10420007B2 patent drawing
  • US10420007B2 patent drawing
  • US10420007B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A battery-powered node within a wireless mesh network performs energy-aware packet routing based on multiple factors. The battery powered node computes, for a given link to an adjacent node, the energy needed to transmit a packet to the adjacent node. The battery-powered node also determines the amount of battery energy remaining in the adjacent node. Based on these two factors, the battery powered node computes a link cost associated with the link to the adjacent node. The battery-powered node performs a similar computation for all adjacent nodes and then forwards packets via these adjacent nodes based on the associated link costs. The battery-powered node also maintains a table of routes through adjacent nodes, and reroutes packets through different adjacent nodes in response to link failures.