Energy-Based Latent Variable Neural Network Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Training neural networks based on energy-based latent variable models (EBLVMs) is challenging due to the presence of latent variables, which complicates the incorporation of structural assumptions and leads to high-bias or high-variance variational bounds, especially in high-dimensional data such as images.

Innovation Solution

A bi-level score matching method is introduced to optimize the network parameters by approximating the true posterior probability distribution of latent variables using a variational posterior distribution, allowing for the training of EBLVMs without structural assumptions, and repeating the process on different minibatches until convergence is reached.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If MLE or VI methods are used to train EBLVMs, then the model can incorporate latent variables, but the variational bounds become high-bias or high-variance especially in high-dimensional data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to incorporate latent variablesVSAvoidvariational bound accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary objective function that bridges the gap between intractable true posterior and variational approximation. By using this intermediate objective, the method avoids directly optimizing the high-variance variational bounds while still enabling latent variable incorporation through the variational distribution q(z|x;φ).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the optimization parameters from directly optimizing variational bounds (which suffer from high bias/variance) to optimizing an intermediate objective function with respect to parameters φ. This parameter transformation stabilizes the training process for high-dimensional data while preserving latent variable capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If Score Matching method is used to avoid partition function, then training becomes simpler, but incorporating latent variables becomes much more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining simplicityVSAvoidmodel training complexity with latent variables
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training process into two distinct phases: first optimizing the variational distribution parameters φ using score matching on the intermediate objective, then optimizing the energy model parameters θ. This segmentation makes the otherwise intractable problem of incorporating latent variables in score matching manageable by breaking it into solvable subproblems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediate objective function as a mediator between the simple score matching framework and the complex latent variable model. This intermediate objective enables the use of score matching's simplicity while accommodating latent variables through the variational distribution, avoiding the need for partition function computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If existing SM extensions for EBLVMs are used, then latent variables can be incorporated, but strong structural assumptions are required on the posterior tractability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to incorporate latent variablesVSAvoidstructural assumptions on posterior
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of assuming the posterior is tractable and deriving methods from that assumption, the patent inverts the approach by starting with an intractable posterior and deriving an intermediate objective that works regardless of posterior tractability. This eliminates the need for strong structural assumptions while still enabling latent variable incorporation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The intermediate objective function serves as a mediator that decouples the requirement for tractable posteriors from the ability to incorporate latent variables. By optimizing this intermediate objective rather than directly optimizing the intractable posterior, the method eliminates structural assumptions while maintaining adaptability to latent variable models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230394304A1Method and Apparatus for Neural Network Based on Energy-Based Latent Variable Models
Publication Date: 2023.12.07 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20230394304A1 patent drawing
  • US20230394304A1 patent drawing
  • US20230394304A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for training neural networks based on energy-based latent variable models (EBLVMs) includes bi-level optimizations based on a score matching objective. The lower-level optimizes a variational posterior distribution of the latent variables to approximate the true posterior distribution of the EBLVM, and the higher-level optimizes the neural network parameters based on a modified SM objective as a function of the variational posterior distribution. The method is used to train neural networks based on EBLVMs with nonstructural assumptions.