Energy Control System with Local User Override

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an effective method to control energy usage, particularly in scenarios where users want to minimize consumption during peak pricing times, without relinquishing complete control to centralized management systems.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a request interface, scheduler, and command provider that receives instructions to control energy use, identifies devices, and generates messages to limit energy consumption, utilizing protocols like ANSI C12.22 and ZigBee for communication across a mesh network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If centralized management systems control energy use, then energy consumption during peak pricing times is reduced, but user control over energy decisions is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumption during peak pricing timesVSAvoiduser control over energy decisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments control authority between centralized management and local devices. The head end server provides pricing information and coordination, while local energy management devices autonomously decide when to operate appliances based on user-defined preferences and real-time pricing signals, resolving the contradiction between centralized energy optimization and user control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by enabling individual energy management devices to make autonomous decisions based on their specific user preferences and local conditions. Each device can independently respond to pricing signals according to user-defined rules, allowing energy optimization at the local level while preserving user control, rather than imposing uniform centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If users operate appliances during off-peak times to save costs, then energy expenditure is reduced, but operational flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy expenditureVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic control where appliances can flexibly adjust their operation timing based on real-time pricing signals and user preferences. Users can dynamically modify their preferences and the system adapts to changing conditions, allowing operational flexibility while still achieving cost savings through intelligent timing decisions rather than rigid off-peak-only operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where the head end server provides real-time pricing information back to energy management devices, which then adjust appliance operation accordingly. This continuous feedback loop enables users to achieve cost savings while maintaining operational flexibility, as the system adapts to both pricing conditions and user needs rather than enforcing fixed scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8725274B2Energy use control system and method
Publication Date: 2014.05.13 TRILLIANT NETWORKS INC
  • US8725274B2 patent drawing
  • US8725274B2 patent drawing
  • US8725274B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices and systems control energy usage in accordance with instructions from a head end system. A device may be instructed to cease energy consumption. Another device may allow users to override some instructions. Messages may be provided to users to request the cessation of energy consumption; the users may, but need not comply.