Energy Map Visualization for Resource Allocation Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current executive dashboards are inadequate in tracking how resources are allocated to company priorities, making it difficult for senior executives to determine which team members are assigned to each priority and the quantity of resources devoted to achieving them, leading to inefficient resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

A mechanism for creating an energy map that visually represents the allocation of resources to different priorities, allowing executives to understand and compare the importance of priorities with the resources allocated to them, enabling better decision-making on resource reallocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If current executive dashboards are used to track company priorities, then information can be presented in a graphical format, but the dashboards fail to provide visibility into resource allocation and energy devoted to each priority

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation informationVSAvoiddashboard functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the dashboard into distinct functional modules: a priority definition module that defines company priorities with importance levels, a task assignment module that assigns tasks to team members linked to priorities, and an energy map module that visualizes resource allocation. This segmentation allows each module to handle specific aspects of priority tracking independently, preventing information loss while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimensional representation called the 'energy map' that adds a visual dimension to traditional dashboards. This energy map uses graphical indicators (such as bar lengths or color intensities) to represent the amount of energy or resources devoted to each priority, transforming abstract resource allocation data into a visually perceivable dimension that complements the tabular priority information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If detailed tracking of team member assignments and resource quantities is implemented, then resource utilization efficiency improves, but the complexity of the tracking system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidtracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service capabilities where team members automatically report their task completion status and energy expenditure through simple interface interactions. The system automatically aggregates this data and updates the energy map visualizations without requiring manual intervention from executives. This automation maintains high resource utilization efficiency while minimizing the operational complexity of the tracking system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where the energy map visualizations provide immediate feedback to executives about resource allocation imbalances. When certain priorities receive disproportionate energy investment compared to their importance level, the system highlights these discrepancies, enabling executives to make real-time adjustments. This feedback mechanism improves resource utilization efficiency by making allocation issues visible without requiring complex analytical tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If the dashboard displays comprehensive information about all priorities and resources, then complete visibility is achieved, but the information becomes difficult to absorb in a short time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepriority status informationVSAvoidexecutive review time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs color-coded indicators in the energy map to convey priority status and resource allocation information at a glance. Different colors represent different importance levels, resource allocation adequacy, and completion statuses. This color-coding system allows executives to absorb comprehensive priority information rapidly by processing visual cues rather than reading detailed text descriptions, thus reducing review time while maintaining complete information visibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a hierarchical information display where the energy map provides a high-level overview of all priorities and resource allocations simultaneously. Executives can quickly scan the entire portfolio of priorities using the visual map, then drill down into specific priority details only when needed. This partial viewing approach allows comprehensive information to be available without requiring executives to process all details at once, significantly reducing absorption time while maintaining complete information accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11741403B2Method, computer program product, and apparatus for providing an energy map
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 LEADLINE LLC
  • US11741403B2 patent drawing
  • US11741403B2 patent drawing
  • US11741403B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for providing a planning canvas may include receiving a request for a planning canvas, defining one or more group priorities for the planning canvas for one or more time periods based at least in part on one or more received user interactions, receiving a confirmation to release the planning canvas, and in response to receiving the confirmation to release the planning canvas, enabling access to the one or more group priorities for one or more associated users.