Energy Storage Selection via Utilization Efficiency Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The temporal misalignment between peak power generation from intermittent energy sources like solar and wind and peak electricity demand poses challenges, necessitating energy storage solutions that are difficult to compare and select due to varying costs, efficiencies, and usage types.

Innovation Solution

A data aggregator system that collects energy consumption and production data to calculate a utilization efficiency score for different energy storage solutions, providing personalized recommendations based on customer behavior, location, and other factors to determine the optimal energy storage method.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple types of energy storage devices are considered (batteries, flywheels, pumped hydroelectric facilities), then the variety of storage solutions increases, but the difficulty of comparison and selection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariety of storage solutionsVSAvoiddifficulty of comparison and selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the complex selection problem into a comparable format by changing parameters into standardized metrics. It establishes evaluation criteria including technical performance parameters (storage capacity, efficiency, response time), economic parameters (cost, levelized cost of storage), and operational parameters (lifespan, maintenance requirements). This parameter standardization enables direct comparison across different energy storage technologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary evaluation framework that mediates between diverse energy storage technologies and customer selection needs. This framework includes weighted scoring models, multi-criteria decision analysis tools, and standardized comparison matrices that act as intermediaries to translate technical specifications into actionable selection guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If energy storage solutions are selected without considering temporal misalignment, then selection simplicity is maintained, but the effectiveness of addressing peak demand issues deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection simplicityVSAvoideffectiveness of addressing peak demand
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that analyze actual energy consumption patterns and storage performance data. The system continuously monitors when energy is stored and discharged, comparing this against peak demand periods. This feedback loop enables dynamic optimization of storage operation timing, ensuring that stored energy is discharged during actual peak demand periods while maintaining simple customer-facing interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of customer energy consumption patterns and load profiles before making storage recommendations. By pre-analyzing when peak demand occurs for each customer and modeling different storage discharge scenarios, the system prepares optimized timing strategies in advance, eliminating the need for complex real-time customer decisions while ensuring peak demand effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If detailed consumption data and production data are collected, then the accuracy of utilization efficiency scoring improves, but the data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of utilization efficiency scoringVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data processing task into distinct modular components: data collection modules that gather consumption and production data, data validation modules that clean and standardize inputs, analysis modules that calculate utilization efficiency scores, and reporting modules that present results. Each segment handles specific data processing functions, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high measurement precision through specialized processing at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10817789B2Determination of optimal energy storage methods at electric customer service points
Publication Date: 2020.10.27 OPOWER
  • US10817789B2 patent drawing
  • US10817789B2 patent drawing
  • US10817789B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the subject technology relate to methods and systems for recommending an energy storage device. In some aspects, a method of the subject technology can include steps for aggregating consumption data for a customer, receiving energy production data for each of a plurality of energy production sources, and determining a utilization efficiency score for each of the plurality of energy storage devices based on the consumption data and the energy production data. In some aspects, methods of the subject technology can also include steps for ranking two or more of the energy storage devices based on the utilization efficiency. In some aspects, machine-readable media are also provided.