Energy Recovery Ventilator Defrost Control via Heat-Transfer Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Energy recovery ventilator units often become frosted, reducing their functionality due to air-flow blockages and frost formation, which existing methods fail to address efficiently in terms of energy expenditure and operational time.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for defrosting energy recovery ventilator units by activating a defrost process when an air-flow blockage coincides with a frost threshold, using a defrost control module to monitor and terminate the process when heat transfer efficiency returns to within 10% of pre-frosting levels, incorporating powered heat sources and airflow adjustments to minimize energy and time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a defrost process is activated to remove frost from the enthalpy-exchange zone, then the air-flow blockage is reduced and functionality is restored, but energy consumption increases during the defrost process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctionality of enthalpy-exchange zoneVSAvoidenergy consumption during defrost process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of frost conditions by monitoring air-flow blockage and ambient temperature before activating the defrost process. This allows the defrost process to be triggered only when frost is detected, avoiding unnecessary energy consumption while ensuring functionality is restored when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from heat transfer efficiency monitoring to determine when to terminate the defrost process. When heat transfer efficiency returns to within 10 percent of pre-frosting levels, the defrost process is automatically terminated, preventing excessive energy consumption while ensuring complete frost removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the defrost process is activated frequently to maintain optimal performance, then the heat transfer efficiency is maintained, but the operational downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidoperational downtime during defrost process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors air-flow blockage and ambient temperature to detect frost conditions before they significantly degrade heat transfer efficiency. This preliminary detection allows for timely defrost activation that minimizes operational downtime while maintaining performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors heat transfer efficiency during and after the defrost process to determine when optimal performance has been restored. The defrost process is terminated when efficiency returns to within 10 percent of pre-frosting levels, ensuring minimal operational downtime while maintaining reliable performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If the defrost process is activated based on ambient temperature alone, then the response time is reduced, but false activation occurs without actual frost blockage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse time to frost conditionsVSAvoidaccuracy of frost detection
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple detection methods - air-flow blockage monitoring and ambient temperature sensing - to determine when to activate the defrost process. This merged approach ensures that the defrost process is activated only when both conditions indicate actual frost formation, reducing false activation while maintaining rapid response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from real-time monitoring of air-flow blockage and temperature conditions to verify actual frost presence before activation. This feedback mechanism ensures accurate detection of frost conditions, preventing false activation while maintaining fast response when genuine frost blockage occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively defrosts energy recovery ventilator units while minimizing energy consumption and operational downtime, preventing damage to components and maintaining optimal heat transfer efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

activating a defrost process of an enthalpy-exchange zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

defrost process... terminating the defrost process when a heat transfer efficiency across the enthalpy-exchange zone returns

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

heat transfer efficiency across the enthalpy-exchange zone... temperature difference between an intake air zone of the energy recovery ventilator and a supply air zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS9791163B2Method of defrosting an energy recovery ventilator unit
Publication Date: 2017.10.17 LENNOX IND INC
  • US9791163B2 patent drawing
  • US9791163B2 patent drawing
  • US9791163B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of defrosting an energy recovery ventilator unit. The method comprises defrosting an energy recovery ventilator unit. The method comprises activating a defrost process of an enthalpy-exchange zone of the energy recovery ventilator unit when an air-flow blockage in the enthalpy-exchange zone coincides with a frost threshold in the ambient environment surrounding the energy recovery ventilator unit. The method also comprises terminating the defrost process when a heat transfer efficiency across the enthalpy-exchange zone returns to within 10 percent of a pre-frosting heat transfer efficiency wherein, the heat transfer efficiency is proportional to a temperature difference between an intake air zone of the energy recovery ventilator and a supply air zone of the energy recovery ventilator divided by a temperature difference between an return air zone of the energy recovery ventilator and the intake air zone.