Energy virtualization layer with a universal smart gateway

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current energy management systems in commercial and residential settings are inflexible, prone to monopolies, and lack security, leading to inefficiencies and vulnerabilities, as they rely on centralized control and proprietary interfaces, limiting the integration of new devices and technologies.

Innovation Solution

An energy virtualization system with a physical interface gateway and a virtualization layer that allows for dynamic integration and management of energy-producing, control, and consuming devices, using standardized interfaces and a mesh network design to facilitate plug-and-play functionality and secure authentication, enabling efficient energy distribution and management across diverse platforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a centralized control system with proprietary interfaces is used, then system control and management are simplified, but device integration flexibility and security are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem controlVSAvoiddevice integration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments control functionality into distributed energy control devices rather than centralized control. Each control device operates autonomously within its local network, enabling flexible device integration while maintaining simplified operational control through standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universal standardized interfaces that enable diverse energy-producing, control, and consuming devices to integrate into the network without proprietary dependencies. This multi-functional interface approach allows any compliant device to communicate and operate within the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If proprietary interfaces are used, then system security is enhanced, but interoperability and integration of new devices are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem securityVSAvoidinteroperability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces authentication servers as intermediary components that verify device credentials and manage security protocols. This intermediary layer enables secure communication while maintaining interoperability through standardized authentication mechanisms that work across diverse devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where authentication servers continuously verify device credentials and system status. This ongoing authentication feedback ensures security is maintained dynamically while allowing legitimate new devices to integrate through the standardized protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If centralized control architecture is used, then system management is simplified, but single points of failure are created

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem managementVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments control functions into distributed autonomous energy control devices rather than centralized management. This segmentation eliminates single points of failure while maintaining simplified management through standardized communication protocols and authentication mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple distributed control devices into a coordinated network that functions as a unified system. Through standardized interfaces and authentication protocols, these merged devices achieve simplified system-wide management while maintaining distributed reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If standardized interfaces are implemented, then device interoperability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice interoperabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses standardized interface specifications as reusable templates that can be copied and implemented across different devices. This copying approach enables interoperability through proven standardized protocols while reducing overall system complexity by avoiding custom interface development for each device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11271766B2Energy virtualization layer with a universal smart gateway
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 SYNCELLS INC
  • US11271766B2 patent drawing
  • US11271766B2 patent drawing
  • US11271766B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An energy virtualization system may include a physical interface gateway that may include a plurality of common interfaces. The plurality of common interfaces may be coupled to a plurality of energy-producing devices, a plurality of energy-control devices, and a plurality of energy-consuming devices. The system may also include a building network, where the plurality of energy-producing devices, the plurality of energy-control devices, and the plurality of energy-consuming devices can communicate through building network. The system may additionally include a computing device running an energy virtualization layer. The virtualization layer may include a plurality of virtual devices representing the plurality of energy-producing devices, the plurality of energy-control devices; and the plurality of energy-consuming devices. The virtualization layer may also direct energy from the energy-producing devices to the energy-consuming devices according to information received from the energy-control devices.