Energy virtualization layer with a universal smart gateway

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current energy management systems are inefficient due to restrictive use of energy sources, leading to significant waste and monopolization, with traditional building management systems being inflexible, insecure, and proprietary, limiting innovation and interoperability.

Innovation Solution

An energy virtualization system with a physical interface gateway and a computing device running an energy virtualization layer that communicates and manages energy-producing, control, and consuming devices, allowing for dynamic integration, monitoring, and management of energy resources across various platforms and applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional building management systems are used, then system stability is maintained, but adaptability and interoperability are limited due to proprietary and inflexible architecture

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the building management architecture into distinct layers: physical devices layer, gateway layer with virtualization, and application layer. This segmentation allows each layer to operate independently with standardized interfaces, improving adaptability without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gateway device is designed as a universal platform that can manage multiple types of energy-producing, energy-consuming, and energy-control devices through virtualization. This multi-functionality enables a single gateway to handle diverse devices without requiring device-specific management systems, thereby improving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of energy

If energy sources are restricted to single applications, then device simplicity is maintained, but energy efficiency deteriorates due to significant waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy wasteVSAvoidenergy flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the gateway continuously monitors energy production, consumption, and control data from various devices. This feedback enables dynamic optimization of energy allocation and routing, reducing energy waste by directing energy from producing devices to consuming devices based on real-time conditions and requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The virtualization layer enables dynamic parameter changes in energy management by adjusting energy allocation parameters, routing parameters, and control parameters based on varying conditions. This allows the system to optimize energy efficiency across different applications and time periods without being restricted to single-use scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If proprietary building management systems are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but interoperability and innovation are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsystem security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The gateway acts as an intermediary between physical devices and application systems, providing standardized interfaces and protocols. This intermediary layer enables different devices and systems to communicate and interact without requiring proprietary integrations, thereby improving interoperability and system security while maintaining ease of operation through unified access points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If virtualization layer is implemented, then energy management efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional system layers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanagement efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The virtualization layer creates virtual representations (copies) of physical energy devices, allowing the system to manage and control devices through these virtual models. This copying approach enables efficient energy management and coordination without requiring direct complex interactions with each physical device, thereby improving productivity while managing architecture complexity through abstraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11394573B2Energy virtualization layer with a universal smart gateway
Publication Date: 2022.07.19 SYNCELLS INC
  • US11394573B2 patent drawing
  • US11394573B2 patent drawing
  • US11394573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An energy virtualization system may include a physical interface gateway that may include a plurality of common interfaces. The plurality of common interfaces may be coupled to a plurality of energy-producing devices, a plurality of energy-control devices, and a plurality of energy-consuming devices. The system may also include a building network, where the plurality of energy-producing devices, the plurality of energy-control devices, and the plurality of energy-consuming devices can communicate through building network. The system may additionally include a computing device running an energy virtualization layer. The virtualization layer may include a plurality of virtual devices representing the plurality of energy-producing devices, the plurality of energy-control devices; and the plurality of energy-consuming devices. The virtualization layer may also direct energy from the energy-producing devices to the energy-consuming devices according to information received from the energy-control devices.