Enforcement Point for Real-Time Adversarial Attack Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

AI/ML models are unpatchable in real-time and lack visibility for adversarial attacks, as traditional adversarial training is slow and makes attacks invisible, leading to long response times and extended release cycles.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an enforcement point with adversarial detection models that analyze user input data for adversarial attacks, providing real-time detection and prevention, and updating information to facilitate faster deployment of new models and collection of adversarial samples for future training.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If adversarial training is used to harden ML models, then models become immune to adversarial attacks, but response time becomes very long and release cycles lengthen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmunity to adversarial attacksVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the security function into two distinct components: an adversarial training module that periodically retrains the ML model to improve robustness, and an enforcement point with adversarial detection models that provide real-time attack detection. This segmentation allows the detection component to operate instantly without the computational burden of full adversarial training, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability improvement and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary adversarial training in advance to build a baseline of adversarial patterns, then uses pre-trained adversarial detection models at the enforcement point for real-time detection. The preliminary training prepares the system ahead of time, so when actual attacks occur, the enforcement point can immediately detect and block them without waiting for lengthy retraining cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If adversarial training is used to harden ML models, then models become immune to adversarial attacks, but adversarial attacks become invisible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmunity to adversarial attacksVSAvoidvisibility of adversarial attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary enforcement point with specialized adversarial detection models that sit between the user input and the main ML model. This intermediary layer detects adversarial patterns in incoming data before they reach the hardened ML model, making previously invisible attacks detectable while preserving the model's immunity through adversarial training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates separate adversarial detection models that are copies or variants of the main ML model, specifically trained to identify adversarial patterns rather than perform the primary classification task. These copied models with specialized detection functions allow visibility into attacks without interfering with the main model's immune response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If traditional adversarial training is used, then ML models are protected, but patching in real-time is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against adversarial attacksVSAvoidreal-time patching capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic protection by continuously updating adversarial detection models at the enforcement point based on newly discovered attack patterns. While the main ML model undergoes periodic adversarial training, the enforcement point can dynamically adapt to new threats in real-time by deploying updated detection models, enabling real-time patching without requiring full model retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary adversarial training in advance to build a baseline of adversarial patterns, then uses pre-trained adversarial detection models at the enforcement point for real-time detection. The preliminary training prepares the system ahead of time, so when actual attacks occur, the enforcement point can immediately detect and block them without waiting for lengthy retraining cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11983271B2Inline detection and prevention of adversarial attacks
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11983271B2 patent drawing
  • US11983271B2 patent drawing
  • US11983271B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A processor may generate an enforcement point. The enforcement point may include one or more adversarial detection models. The processor may receive user input data. The processor may analyze, at the enforcement point, the user input data. The processor may determine, from the analyzing, whether there is an adversarial attack in the user input data. The processor may generate an alert based on the determining.