User Engagement Data Labeling for Adaptive Action Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

User data distributed across various locations and modalities pose challenges for effective analysis, particularly in understanding user engagement patterns.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing an application programming interface (API), interactive user interface, processor, and memory to receive, identify, label, and generate action data through machine-learning models, updating the models with user engagement data for improved user engagement analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If user data are distributed across various locations and modalities, then data coverage and comprehensiveness are improved, but data analysis difficulty and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata coverageVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments distributed user data from various locations and modalities into structured components through automated extraction and labeling processes. The system divides unstructured data into labeled datasets that can be processed independently by machine learning models, reducing overall processing complexity while maintaining comprehensive data coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated data processing system that acts as a mediator between distributed data sources and analysis tools. This intermediary system performs automated extraction, labeling, and structuring of data, transforming heterogeneous distributed data into a unified format that simplifies subsequent analysis operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If traditional data analysis methods are used on unstructured user data, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but analysis effectiveness and insight quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidanalysis effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by automatically extracting and labeling user engagement data before analysis. The system performs data preparation steps including extraction from multiple sources, labeling with relevant attributes, and structuring into training datasets ahead of time. This preliminary processing maintains ease of operation while dramatically improving analysis effectiveness by providing clean, structured input data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual data analysis methods with automated machine learning models. The system substitutes mechanical manual processing with intelligent automated systems that can handle unstructured data more effectively, improving analysis precision while maintaining operational simplicity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of time

If static machine-learning models are used for user engagement prediction, then model development time is reduced, but prediction accuracy and adaptability to changing user behavior deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel development timeVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by enabling machine learning models to continuously learn and adapt from newly labeled user engagement data. The system transitions from static models to dynamic models that automatically update their parameters and structures based on incoming data, maintaining prediction accuracy as user behavior patterns evolve over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where model predictions are continuously evaluated against actual user engagement outcomes. This feedback loop enables the system to identify prediction errors and automatically retrain models with corrected data, improving prediction accuracy while maintaining efficient development cycles through automated iterative improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12488244B1Apparatus and method for data generation for user engagement
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 UVA IP LLC
  • US12488244B1 patent drawing
  • US12488244B1 patent drawing
  • US12488244B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method for data generation for user engagement are disclosed. The apparatus includes an application programming interface, an interactive user interface, at least a processor and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor, wherein the memory contains instructions configuring the at least a processor to receive user data from the interactive user interface, identify first user engagement data as a function of the user data, label the first user engagement data to at least an engagement label, generate action data as a function of the first user engagement data containing the at least an engagement label, trigger the action data using the application programming interface, receive second user engagement data as a function of the triggered action data from the interactive user interface and update the action data as a function of the second user engagement data.