Engine Acoustics Control via Dynamic Parameter Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current engine noise reduction methods, such as structural modifications, add weight, complexity, and cost, and only address noise issues during specific flight conditions, failing to effectively manage noise levels in all operational scenarios, particularly near populated areas where regulatory limits apply.

Innovation Solution

An operations support system for gas turbine engines that includes a diagnostics module using thermodynamic models to generate diagnostics data, an acoustics module to calculate and adjust noise levels, and a graphical user interface to display and manage acoustic characteristics, allowing for real-time noise evaluation and adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If structural modifications such as additional sound insulation are implemented to reduce engine noise, then noise levels are reduced, but weight, complexity, and cost increase while performance and efficiency are adversely impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine noiseVSAvoidengine weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts engine operating parameters (such as fuel injection timing, air-fuel ratio, and valve timing) in real-time based on acoustic sensors that monitor noise levels. This dynamic control allows the engine to reduce noise during ground operations and near populated areas without requiring permanent structural modifications, thereby avoiding weight penalties while maintaining performance during flight operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes operational parameters (temperature, pressure, flow rates) of engine components to optimize acoustic characteristics. By adjusting these parameters through software control rather than physical modifications, the system achieves noise reduction without adding weight or reducing performance, resolving the contradiction between noise control and engine efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If structural modifications are made to reduce engine noise, then noise levels are reduced, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine noiseVSAvoidengine structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical noise reduction structures (such as acoustic liners and insulation materials) with an electronic control system that uses sensors and software to actively manage engine acoustics. This substitution eliminates the need for complex structural modifications while achieving comparable or superior noise control, thereby reducing device complexity and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The noise control system is integrated into the existing engine control unit, allowing the same hardware to perform both performance optimization and acoustic management functions. This multi-functionality approach avoids adding separate dedicated noise reduction components, thereby minimizing increases in device complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If structural modifications are implemented to address noise issues, then noise levels are reduced during specific flight conditions, but adaptability to different operational scenarios is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine noiseVSAvoidnoise control across flight conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors engine operating conditions and acoustic output, dynamically adjusting control parameters to optimize noise reduction for each specific flight condition. This dynamic adaptability allows the engine to effectively manage noise during ground operations, takeoff, cruise, and landing, whereas static structural modifications can only address noise at fixed operating points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates acoustic sensors that provide real-time feedback on noise levels to the control unit, which then adjusts engine parameters to maintain compliance with noise regulations across varying flight conditions. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables continuous adaptation to different operational scenarios, unlike open-loop structural modifications that cannot respond to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9376983B2Operations support systems and methods with acoustics evaluation and control
Publication Date: 2016.06.28 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US9376983B2 patent drawing
  • US9376983B2 patent drawing
  • US9376983B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An operations support system is provided for an engine. The system includes a diagnostics module configured to receive engine data from the engine and to generate diagnostics data based on the engine data using a thermodynamic model, the thermodynamic model being based on component maps associated with the engine; an acoustics module coupled to the diagnostics module and comprising an acoustics calculation unit, the acoustics calculation unit configured to receive the diagnostics data and to determine an acoustics level for the engine based on the diagnostics data; and a graphical user interface coupled to the acoustics module and configured to display the acoustics level.