Engine Blade Thermal Acoustic Inspection for Defect Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated inspection systems for engine blades using thermal acoustic imaging are inefficient due to the need for manual analysis of scan data, which is tedious, time-consuming, and prone to errors, especially when dealing with non-crack-like indications such as foreign material, non-uniform paint, and noise.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that uses thermal acoustic imaging (TAI) to generate scans, applies an indication detection module to identify potential defects, and employs a ranking system to prioritize defects based on attributes and likelihood, using machine learning techniques to distinguish between actual defects and non-defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated inspection systems are used to inspect engine blades, then inspection speed is improved, but the accuracy and reliability of defect detection deteriorates due to manual analysis requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection speedVSAvoiddefect detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system performs self-service by automatically analyzing TAI scan data through automated workflows that detect indications, evaluate confidence levels, and prioritize defects without requiring manual analyst intervention for each inspection case

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis with automated computational systems that process thermal acoustic imaging data through algorithms, machine learning models, and automated workflows to detect and prioritize defects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual analysis of scan data is performed, then defect detection accuracy is improved, but inspection time and workload increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis to detect and prioritize defects before manual review is needed, pre-processing the scan data to identify potential indications and rank them by confidence level and severity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated inspection system performs self-service by independently analyzing TAI scan data, detecting indications, evaluating confidence levels, and prioritizing defects without requiring manual analyst intervention for each inspection case

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated workflows are used to analyze TAI scan data, then inspection efficiency is improved, but the ability to handle complex non-crack-like indications deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection efficiencyVSAvoidcomplex indication differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis with automated computational systems that process thermal acoustic imaging data through algorithms, machine learning models, and automated workflows to detect and prioritize defects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the approach by analyzing multiple parameters including confidence levels, indication types, and spatial characteristics to differentiate between crack-like and non-crack-like indications, enabling automated handling of complex cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system efficiently ranks potential defects by considering various factors, reducing the need for manual inspection and improving the accuracy and speed of defect detection in engine blades.

Implementation Method 1

generating a thermal acoustic imaging (TAI) scan of a component using an infrared camera

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS20250341425A1Automated engine blade inspection methods and system
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 RTX CORP
  • US20250341425A1 patent drawing
  • US20250341425A1 patent drawing
  • US20250341425A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A thermal acoustic imaging (TAI) inspection system scans a component using an infrared camera to capture a plurality of image frames of friction heat emitting from a possible defect in the component. The TAI inspection system generates a TAI scan that is provided to an indication analysis system having modules to determine whether one or more indications exist for the possible defects within the TAI scan. Each indication has attributes, including a matching score. The respective indication and its attributes are provided to a ranking system. The ranking system determines a priority score for the component or part of the component having the one or more indications based on the attributes. The priority score is used to rank the component or part of the component for further inspection operations.