Turbine Engine Case Stiffener Layout for High-Stress Hub-Arm Junctions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbomachine exhaust casings are prone to damage from tensile and compressive forces, particularly at the junction of the hub and arms, necessitating extra thicknesses for reinforcement, which increases the structure's mass.

Innovation Solution

The casing incorporates main and secondary stiffeners with ribs and inner stiffeners, each with complementary shapes, to enhance structural resistance without increasing mass, utilizing additive manufacturing for complex shapes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If extra thicknesses are provided in high-stress areas to withstand tensile and compressive forces, then the strength and reliability of the casing are improved, but the mass of the structure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidmass
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement is segmented into discrete stiffeners positioned at specific high-stress locations rather than uniformly thickening the entire casing. Main stiffeners are placed at hub-arm junctions, and secondary stiffeners are positioned along arms, concentrating material where needed to resist tensile and compressive forces while minimizing overall mass increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The casing structure transitions from uniform thickness to variable local thickness with stiffeners only where stresses are highest. The hub, arms, and shroud maintain their base thickness except at reinforced locations, applying the principle of local quality enhancement precisely where mechanical demands require it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If extra thicknesses are provided in high-stress areas to withstand tensile and compressive forces, then the reliability of the casing is improved, but the complexity of the structure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement system is segmented into distinct functional components: main stiffeners at critical junctions and secondary stiffeners along arm lengths. This segmentation allows each element to be optimized for its specific structural role while maintaining overall reliability without creating a monolithic complex structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stiffener geometry incorporates dynamic adaptation through variable cross-sections and orientations that respond to different stress states. Main stiffeners feature curved profiles that adapt to tensile and compressive loads, while secondary stiffeners are positioned to address varying stress distributions along the arms, enhancing reliability through dynamic structural response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12607134B2Case comprising internal and/or external stiffeners
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US12607134B2 patent drawing
  • US12607134B2 patent drawing
  • US12607134B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a turbine engine case (1), extending around an axis, said case (1) comprising: a hub comprising an outer wall (21) and an inner wall (22) between which an annular flange (23) extends; an outer shell (3); a plurality of arms (4) which each extend between the hub and the outer shell (3); the case (1) further comprising a plurality of main stiffeners (5), each being disposed in the extension of an arm (4) between the outer wall (21) and the inner wall (22) projecting from the flange (23), each main stiffener (5) comprising two ribs (51, 52) arranged opposite one another and which move away from one another from the outer wall (21) towards the inner wall (22).