Engine Control Module Runtime Calibration for Power System Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine optimization processes are not adaptable to individual needs or uses, as they are typically configured and calibrated during manufacturing and do not account for specific operating characteristics such as usage rate, performance, or cost, limiting their effectiveness in optimizing engine efficiency and emissions.

Innovation Solution

An engine control module with a memory and processors that receive calibration information to optimize operating characteristics by iteratively performing optimization processes to determine optimized values for adjustable parameters, configuring control devices to optimize specific operating characteristics such as efficiency, emissions, and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If optimization processes are configured and calibrated during manufacturing, then the engine can operate with certain levels of efficiency, emissions, and performance, but the system cannot adapt to individual needs or uses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to individual needsVSAvoidcalibration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization process transitions from a static, factory-calibrated state to a dynamic, runtime-calibrated state. The system continuously adjusts optimization parameters based on real-time calibration data received from external sources, enabling adaptation to individual needs while maintaining manageable complexity through automated parameter tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes optimization parameters dynamically during operation rather than fixing them during manufacturing. Calibration data modifies key parameters such as efficiency targets, emissions limits, and performance thresholds, allowing the same hardware to be optimized for different applications without physical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed set of parameters is optimized during manufacturing, then the optimization process is simple and reliable, but it cannot address variable operating characteristics like usage rate, performance, or cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization for variable characteristicsVSAvoidoptimization reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor actual engine performance against target operating characteristics. Calibration data from external sources feeds back into the optimization process, allowing real-time adjustments to parameters while maintaining reliability through closed-loop control and validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calibration using factory-standard parameters to establish a reliable baseline optimization. Before addressing variable operating characteristics, the system first ensures basic optimization reliability through pre-configured calibration, then layers additional adaptability on top without compromising the foundational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple adjustable parameters are optimized in real-time, then individual operating characteristics can be tailored, but the computational complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time optimization capabilityVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization process is segmented into priority levels, with critical parameters (such as emissions limits and safety constraints) optimized first, followed by less critical performance parameters. This segmentation allows the system to achieve meaningful real-time optimization while managing computational energy consumption by focusing resources on the most impactful parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes a selective subset of parameters rather than all possible adjustable parameters simultaneously. By identifying and optimizing only the most relevant parameters for current operating conditions, the system achieves adequate real-time optimization performance while significantly reducing computational energy requirements compared to full-parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10787984B2Power system optimization calibration
Publication Date: 2020.09.29 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US10787984B2 patent drawing
  • US10787984B2 patent drawing
  • US10787984B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Power system optimization calibration is disclosed. An example implementation includes receiving, by an engine control module, calibration information associated with optimizing an operating characteristic of a power system; determining, by the engine control module and using an optimization model, an optimization profile to optimize the operating characteristic, wherein the optimization model is configured to perform one or more optimization processes to determine, according to the calibration information, optimized values associated with adjustable parameters of the power system, wherein the optimization profile is configured to include the optimized values; and configuring, by the engine control module, a first control device, associated with a first adjustable parameter of the adjustable parameters, according to the optimization profile, wherein the first control device is configured to control a first component of an engine of the power system to be set according to an optimized value for the first adjustable parameter.