Engine Control Redundancy Handover via Supervising Module

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distributed control arrangements for engines face challenges in seamless handover between redundant control entities due to delays in fault detection and state transfer, leading to operational discontinuity and increased data communication requirements.

Innovation Solution

A control arrangement with two or more mutually redundant control modules, a supervising control module, and a bus for information transfer, where the supervising module determines execution and actuation commands based on predefined numbers of control modules receiving and executing measurement parameter values, ensuring synchronized data transfer and minimizing handover disruptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the back-up control entity is continuously updated with the latest measurement signals, then the synchronization between active and back-up entities is improved, but the amount of data transferred increases drastically, causing increased latency or requiring higher-capacity communication links

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization between control entitiesVSAvoidlatency in communicating measurement signals
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential internal state information needed for handover continuity, rather than transferring all measurement signals. The back-up entity maintains its own independent control function and only receives minimal state data when needed, eliminating the need for continuous full-data synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The back-up control entity is pre-configured with the capability to execute the control function independently. During normal operation, it performs preliminary computations and maintains readiness without requiring continuous data updates, so that when handover is needed, it can immediately take over with minimal delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If fault detection and state transfer delays are reduced, then the handover speed is improved, but the complexity of the control arrangement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover speedVSAvoidcontrol arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The back-up control entity autonomously monitors the health of the active entity and independently determines when handover is necessary. Each control entity self-manages its own state and can autonomously initiate or accept handover without complex centralized coordination, reducing system complexity while maintaining fast response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control arrangement dynamically adapts between active-back-up and dual-active modes based on real-time conditions. The system flexibility allows it to optimize handover speed when needed while maintaining simplicity during normal operation, avoiding permanent complex infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If both control entities continuously execute the control function, then the readiness for handover is improved, but the amount of computation and data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereadiness for handoverVSAvoidcomputation energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of both entities continuously executing the full control function, the patent implements partial execution where the back-up entity performs only essential computations needed for potential handover. This reduces overall computational energy consumption while maintaining sufficient readiness, as the back-up can quickly complete any additional calculations when actually needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3134633B1Distributed control
Publication Date: 2018.12.05 WARTSILA FINLAND OY
  • EP3134633B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3a
  • EP3134633B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3134633B1 patent drawingFigure 3b~3c

AI summary

A control arrangement (100) for controlling an engine (200) is provided. According to an example embodi- ment, the control arrangement (100) comprises two or more mutually redundant acting control modules (110-, 110-2, 110-3) for providing respective instances of a control function (120) configured to derive a control pa- rameter for adjusting operation of the engine (200) at least on basis of at least one measurement parameter that is descriptive of the engine operation, a supervis- ing control module (110-6) for managing operation of said two or more acting control modules (110-1, 110-2, 10-3), and a bus (130) for transfer of information, said bus (130) arranged to connect said control modules (110) to each other.