Engine Control System for Stochastic Pre-ignition Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional engine control systems are ineffective in preventing stochastic pre-ignition, a random and severe abnormal combustion process that occurs in boosted engines, leading to excessive peak pressures and potential engine damage.

Innovation Solution

A control system that advances spark timing past a spark limit for consecutive cylinder firing events and supplies a rich fuel-air charge to prevent and mitigate stochastic pre-ignition by dislodging and suppressing fuel-oil deposits, using a spark module and fuel module to manage spark timing and fuel-air equivalence ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If spark timing is advanced past the spark limit to improve combustion efficiency, then power output increases, but stochastic pre-ignition occurs causing excessive peak pressures and potential engine damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidstochastic pre-ignition
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by advancing spark timing past the spark limit for N consecutive cylinder firing events before stochastic pre-ignition occurs, inducing spark-knock to dislodge fuel-oil deposits that serve as pre-ignition sources. This preventive measure is taken in advance to eliminate the root cause of stochastic pre-ignition, allowing the system to subsequently operate with more aggressive spark timing without suffering from pre-ignition damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the harmful effect of spark-knock (which was traditionally avoided) into a beneficial cleaning mechanism. By deliberately inducing spark-knock through advanced spark timing, the system dislodges and removes fuel-oil deposits from the combustion chamber that would otherwise cause stochastic pre-ignition. This transforms spark-knock from a harmful phenomenon to a useful deposit-removal mechanism that improves long-term engine reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Reliability

If spark timing is retarded to prevent stochastic pre-ignition, then engine damage is avoided, but combustion efficiency and power output decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine reliabilityVSAvoidpower output
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action through cyclic alternation between two operational modes: a cleaning mode where spark timing is advanced past the spark limit for N consecutive firing events to induce spark-knock and dislodge deposits, followed by a protection mode where spark timing is retarded for M consecutive firing events to prevent stochastic pre-ignition. This periodic switching allows the system to achieve both deposit removal and pre-ignition prevention over time, balancing reliability and power output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If a rich fuel-air charge is supplied to suppress pre-ignition events, then stochastic pre-ignition is reduced, but fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-ignition suppressionVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by supplying rich fuel-air charge (fuel-air equivalence ratio greater than 1.0) only for M consecutive cylinder firing events after spark timing is retarded, rather than continuously enriching the mixture. This temporary enrichment is sufficient to suppress remaining pre-ignition events and cool combustion chamber surfaces, while limiting fuel consumption by returning to stoichiometric or leaner mixtures during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the occurrence of stochastic pre-ignition by inducing spark-knock to dislodge deposits and enriching the fuel-air charge to suppress remaining pre-ignition events, thereby reducing the probability of engine damage and peak pressure issues.

Implementation Method 1

combustion is initiated by an electrical discharge or spark that supplies energy to the fuel-air charge. Once initiated, combustion continues along a flame front

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

The fuel module supplies a rich fuel-air charge to the cylinder for the M consecutive cylinder firing events

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel-air mixing:

Implementation Method 3

a fuel-air equivalence ratio of the fuel-air charge is greater than 1.0 and less than 1.5

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS9127604B2Control system and method for preventing stochastic pre-ignition in an engine
Publication Date: 2015.09.08 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US9127604B2 patent drawing
  • US9127604B2 patent drawing
  • US9127604B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for an engine includes a spark module and a fuel module. The spark module advances spark timing of a cylinder R degrees past a spark limit for N consecutive cylinder firing events, and retards spark timing of the cylinder past the spark limit for M consecutive cylinder firing events after the N consecutive cylinder firing events. The fuel module supplies a rich fuel-air charge to the cylinder for the M consecutive cylinder firing events. According to the system, R is a real number greater than zero, N and M are integers greater than zero, and the spark limit is a control value used to limit an amount of spark advance to prevent spark-knock. A method for controlling an engine is also provided.