Vehicle Engine Control Override via Speed-Adaptive Delay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine control systems face hazardous situations due to malfunctions in electronic and mechanical linkages controlling vehicle accelerators, brakes, and steering, necessitating a solution to override engine controls safely and effectively.

Innovation Solution

A controller system that determines if the brake control is actuated, calculates a delay time based on vehicle speed, and overrides engine controls if the delay time has passed, thereby preventing unintended acceleration or deceleration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If engine control is overridden immediately when brake is actuated, then driver safety is improved, but false overrides during normal braking may occur causing loss of vehicle control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoidfalse override causing loss of control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of brake actuation and calculates a delay time based on vehicle speed before executing the override. This preliminary action allows the system to prepare for potential hazards while avoiding premature responses that could cause false overrides during normal braking operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The delay time is dynamically adjusted based on vehicle speed - higher speeds result in shorter delay times, while lower speeds allow longer delays. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to respond appropriately to different driving conditions, improving safety at high speeds while preventing false overrides at low speeds during normal braking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a fixed delay time is used for override, then system complexity is reduced, but safety may be compromised at different vehicle speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverride systemVSAvoidsafety at different speeds
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the delay time parameter based on vehicle speed. Rather than using a fixed delay, the delay time is adjusted as a variable parameter that responds to changing operating conditions. This allows the simple override logic to adapt to different speeds, maintaining safety across various driving conditions without requiring complex control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If override is delayed to avoid false activation, then false overrides are prevented, but response time to actual hazards is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse overrides preventedVSAvoidresponse time to hazard
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The delay time parameter is dynamically changed based on vehicle speed, creating an inverse relationship between speed and delay duration. At high speeds where hazards are more critical, the delay is shorter for faster response. At low speeds where normal braking is more common, the delay is longer to prevent false overrides. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction between preventing false activations and maintaining rapid hazard response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8845492B2Engine control override systems and methods
Publication Date: 2014.09.30 CUMMINS INC
  • US8845492B2 patent drawing
  • US8845492B2 patent drawing
  • US8845492B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system comprising a controller configured to determine if a brake control of a vehicle is actuated; determine a delay time in response to a speed of the vehicle; determine if the delay time has passed from when the brake control was actuated; and if the delay time has passed, override an engine control of the vehicle.